From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Support PMIC operation region for CrystalCove and XPower
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 00:35:01 +0100
Message-ID: <3052882.EdcZmghHR3@vostro.rjw.lan>
User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.16.0-rc5+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <20141111111152.GX24004@x1>
References: <1414735705-18366-1-git-send-email-aaron.lu@intel.com> <54616E55.80204@intel.com> <20141111111152.GX24004@x1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:11:52 AM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014, Aaron Lu wrote:
> 
> > On 10/31/2014 02:08 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > > On Intel Baytrail-T and Baytrail-T-CR platforms, there are two customized
> > > ACPI operation regions defined for the Power Management Integrated Circuit
> > > device, one is for power resource handling and one is for thermal: sensor
> > > temperature reporting, trip point setting, etc. There are different PMIC
> > > chips used on those platforms and though each has the same two operation
> > > regions and functionality, their implementation is different so every PMIC
> > > will need a driver. But since their functionality is similar, some common
> > > code is abstracted into the intel_soc_pmic_opregion.c.
> > > 
> > > The last version is posted here:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/8/801
> > > 
> > > Changes since then:
> > > 1 Move to drivers/acpi as discussed on the above thread;
> > > 2 Added support for XPower AXP288 PMIC operation region support;
> > > 3 Since operation region handler can not be removed(at the moment at least),
> > >   use bool for the two operation region driver configs instead of tristate;
> > >   Another reason to do this is that, with Mika's MFD ACPI support patch, all
> > >   those MFD cell devices created will have the same modalias as their parent's
> > >   so it doesn't make much sense to compile these drivers into modules.
> > > 
> > > Patch 1 applies on top of Rafael's pm-next branch, and then patch 2 and
> > > patch 3 needs merge of Lee's mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch where the PMIC
> > > driver XPower AXP288 and iio driver axp288_adc is located.
> > 
> > Since patch 2-3 are based on top of the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch, it
> > would be easy to go through the mfd/ib-mfd-iio-3.19 branch.
> > 
> > Rafael,
> > Can I get your ACK for the three patches?
> > 
> > Lee,
> > Can you please take the series if Rafael gives it ack?
> 
> Yes, no problem.

Well, since the code is going to reside mostly in drivers/acpi, I think I should
be applying the patches and from your response it looks like you are fine with
them.  Is that correct?

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/