Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:40:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:40:43 -0500 Received: from noodles.codemonkey.org.uk ([213.152.47.19]:3736 "EHLO noodles.internal") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:40:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:47:08 +0000 From: Dave Jones To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Ulrich Drepper , Alan Cox , Matti Aarnio , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Message-ID: <20021217194708.GA22667@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Ulrich Drepper , Alan Cox , Matti Aarnio , Hugh Dickins , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hpa@transmeta.com References: <3DFF7399.40708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 22 On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 11:10:20AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Intel will fix the stupidities that cause the P4 to be slow at kernel > entry. Somebody already mentioned that apparently the newer P4 cores are > actually faster at system calls than mine is). My HT Northwood returns slightly better results than your xeon, but the syscall stuff still completely trounces it. (19:38:46:davej@tetrachloride:davej)$ ./a.out 440.107164 cycles 1152.596084 cycles Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/