Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:36:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:36:44 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:12556 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 15:36:43 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: HT Benchmarks (was: /proc/cpuinfo and hyperthreading) Date: 17 Dec 2002 12:44:22 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: References: <20021216232755.GA3750@werewolf.able.es> <200212170614.gBH6ELs15888@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1006 Lines: 26 Followup to: <200212170614.gBH6ELs15888@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> By author: Denis Vlasenko In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > As to HT, it's definitely a good thing. Multiple CPUs on a chip is > a logical step. HT in P4 is rather weak, but future processors will > likely have more advanced cores. > SMT and SMP-on-chip are two very different things. > I never heard about HT from AMD camp. I'm curious what they do. ;) Not have insanely long pipelines, so that a single thread can actually use the processor functional units? -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/