Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:43:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:43:19 -0500 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:54800 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Dec 2002 23:43:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 20:52:19 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Stephen Rothwell cc: LKML , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance In-Reply-To: <20021218154023.29726d09.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1057 Lines: 36 On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > It would help to know what "unhappy" means :-) Andrew reported an oops in the BIOS. I ahev the full oops info somewhere, but quite frankly it isn't that readable. It shows EIP: 00b8:[<000044d7>] Not tainted ds: 0000 es: 0000 ss: 0068 Call Trace: [] apm_bios_call+0x75/0xf4 [] cache_init_objs+0x34/0xd8 [] apm_get_power_status+0x42/0x84 [] __alloc_pages+0x77/0x244 [] apm_get_info+0x38/0xe4 [] proc_file_read+0xa9/0x1ac [] vfs_read+0xb7/0x138 [] sys_read+0x2a/0x40 [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb and I suspect the problem is that 0 in ds/es.. > Does the following fix it for you? Untested, assumes cache lines are 32 > bytes. Andrew? Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/