Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267190AbSLRGAg>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:00:36 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267202AbSLRGAg>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:00:36 -0500
Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:48143 "HELO
	kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S267190AbSLRGAf>;
	Wed, 18 Dec 2002 01:00:35 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 22:05:51 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, chris@wirex.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: converting cap_set_pg() to for_each_task_pid()
Message-ID: <20021218060551.GM28629@kroah.com>
References: <20021218055742.GE12812@holomorphy.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20021218055742.GE12812@holomorphy.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 583
Lines: 16

On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 09:57:42PM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> I have a pending patch that converts cap_set_pg() to the
> for_each_task_pid() API. Could you review this, and if it
> pass, include it in your tree?

This is functionally the same, right?
And if so, why do the change, is this now faster somehow?

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/