Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:05:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:05:44 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:59330 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 10:05:43 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 07:13:26 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua, Zwane Mwaikambo cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: lk maintainers Message-ID: <684430000.1040224405@titus> In-Reply-To: <200212180835.gBI8ZDs22220@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> References: <200212170628.gBH6Scs15943@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <200212180600.gBI60js21347@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <200212180835.gBI8ZDs22220@Port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 652 Lines: 17 >> If it's supposed to be current information and to be used by bug >> reporters, then by all means, chop away ;) > > It is suppsed to be accurate. That is why there are timestamps. > OTOH I should mark some entries , also with timestamp. Is there any value in keeping information that's no longer true? I would have thought the credits file was a better place for historical stuff ... M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/