Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:13:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:13:44 -0500 Received: from ophelia.ess.nec.de ([193.141.139.8]:61895 "EHLO ophelia.ess.nec.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:13:39 -0500 From: Erich Focht To: "Martin J. Bligh" , Michael Hohnbaum Subject: [PATCH 2.5.52] NUMA scheduler (1/2) Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:21:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: Robert Love , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Hemminger , linux-kernel References: <200211061734.42713.efocht@ess.nec.de> <200211191726.07214.efocht@ess.nec.de> <200212021629.39060.efocht@ess.nec.de> In-Reply-To: <200212021629.39060.efocht@ess.nec.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="------------Boundary-00=_3GPB2TAF7WTB3B0PZWAZ" Message-Id: <200212181721.39434.efocht@ess.nec.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 13827 Lines: 413 --------------Boundary-00=_3GPB2TAF7WTB3B0PZWAZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is the first part of the minimal NUMA scheduler built on top of the O(1) load balancer. It is rediffed for 2.5.52 and contains a small bugfix in build_node_data(). The two patches are: 01-numa-sched-core-2.5.52-23.patch: core NUMA scheduler infrastructure providing a node aware load_balancer. 02-numa-sched-ilb-2.5.52-21.patch: initial load balancing, selects least loaded node & CPU at exec(). Regards, Erich --------------Boundary-00=_3GPB2TAF7WTB3B0PZWAZ Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="01-numa-sched-core-2.5.52-23.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="01-numa-sched-core-2.5.52-23.patch" diff -urN a/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c --- a/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c 2002-12-16 03:07:56.000000000 +0100 +++ b/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c 2002-12-18 16:53:12.000000000 +0100 @@ -1202,6 +1202,9 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus) { zap_low_mappings(); +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + build_node_data(); +#endif } void __init smp_intr_init() diff -urN a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c --- a/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c 2002-12-16 03:07:50.000000000 +0100 +++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c 2002-12-18 16:53:13.000000000 +0100 @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static void smp_tune_scheduling (void) { - cache_decay_ticks = 10; /* XXX base this on PAL info and cache-bandwidth estimate */ + cache_decay_ticks = 8; /* XXX base this on PAL info and cache-bandwidth estimate */ printk("task migration cache decay timeout: %ld msecs.\n", (cache_decay_ticks + 1) * 1000 / HZ); @@ -522,6 +522,9 @@ printk(KERN_INFO"Total of %d processors activated (%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS).\n", num_online_cpus(), bogosum/(500000/HZ), (bogosum/(5000/HZ))%100); +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + build_node_data(); +#endif } int __devinit diff -urN a/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c --- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c 2002-12-16 03:08:13.000000000 +0100 +++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/smp.c 2002-12-18 16:53:13.000000000 +0100 @@ -679,4 +679,7 @@ /* XXX fix this, xics currently relies on it - Anton */ smp_threads_ready = 1; +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + build_node_data(); +#endif } diff -urN a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h --- a/include/linux/sched.h 2002-12-16 03:07:44.000000000 +0100 +++ b/include/linux/sched.h 2002-12-18 16:53:13.000000000 +0100 @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -446,6 +447,9 @@ # define set_cpus_allowed(p, new_mask) do { } while (0) #endif +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA +extern void build_node_data(void); +#endif extern void set_user_nice(task_t *p, long nice); extern int task_prio(task_t *p); extern int task_nice(task_t *p); diff -urN a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c --- a/kernel/sched.c 2002-12-16 03:08:14.000000000 +0100 +++ b/kernel/sched.c 2002-12-18 16:53:13.000000000 +0100 @@ -158,6 +158,10 @@ struct list_head migration_queue; atomic_t nr_iowait; + + unsigned long wait_time; + int wait_node; + } ____cacheline_aligned; static struct runqueue runqueues[NR_CPUS] __cacheline_aligned; @@ -177,6 +181,55 @@ # define task_running(rq, p) ((rq)->curr == (p)) #endif +#define cpu_to_node(cpu) __cpu_to_node(cpu) +#define LOADSCALE 128 + +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA +/* Number of CPUs per node: sane values until all CPUs are up */ +int _node_nr_cpus[MAX_NUMNODES] = { [0 ... MAX_NUMNODES-1] = NR_CPUS }; +int node_ptr[MAX_NUMNODES+1]; /* first cpu of node (logical cpus are sorted!)*/ +#define node_ncpus(node) _node_nr_cpus[node] + +#define NODE_DELAY_IDLE (1*HZ/1000) +#define NODE_DELAY_BUSY (20*HZ/1000) + +/* the following macro implies that logical CPUs are sorted by node number */ +#define loop_over_node(cpu,node) \ + for(cpu=node_ptr[node]; cpu node -> supernode... by implementing node-distance + * dependent steal delays. + * + * + */ + +struct node_queue_data { + int total_load; + int average_load; + int busiest_cpu; + int busiest_cpu_load; +}; + +/* + * Check if CPUs are balanced. The check is more involved than the O(1) original + * because that one is simply wrong in certain cases (integer arithmetic !!!) EF + */ +#define CPUS_BALANCED(m,t) (((m)<=1) || (((m)-(t))/2 < (((m)+(t))/2 + 3)/4)) +/* + * Check if nodes are imbalanced. "this" node is balanced (compared to the "comp" + * node) when it's load is not smaller than "comp"'s load - LOADSCALE/2. */ -static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_queue(runqueue_t *this_rq, int this_cpu, int idle, int *imbalance) +#define NODES_BALANCED(comp,this) (((comp)-(this)) < LOADSCALE/2) + +static inline runqueue_t *find_busiest_queue(int this_cpu, int idle, int *nr_running) { - int nr_running, load, max_load, i; - runqueue_t *busiest, *rq_src; + runqueue_t *busiest_rq = NULL, *this_rq = cpu_rq(this_cpu), *src_rq; + int busiest_cpu, busiest_node=0, cpu, load, max_avg_load, avg_load; + int n, steal_delay, system_load = 0, this_node=cpu_to_node(this_cpu); + struct node_queue_data nd[MAX_NUMNODES], *node; - /* - * We search all runqueues to find the most busy one. - * We do this lockless to reduce cache-bouncing overhead, - * we re-check the 'best' source CPU later on again, with - * the lock held. - * - * We fend off statistical fluctuations in runqueue lengths by - * saving the runqueue length during the previous load-balancing - * operation and using the smaller one the current and saved lengths. - * If a runqueue is long enough for a longer amount of time then - * we recognize it and pull tasks from it. - * - * The 'current runqueue length' is a statistical maximum variable, - * for that one we take the longer one - to avoid fluctuations in - * the other direction. So for a load-balance to happen it needs - * stable long runqueue on the target CPU and stable short runqueue - * on the local runqueue. - * - * We make an exception if this CPU is about to become idle - in - * that case we are less picky about moving a task across CPUs and - * take what can be taken. - */ if (idle || (this_rq->nr_running > this_rq->prev_nr_running[this_cpu])) - nr_running = this_rq->nr_running; + *nr_running = this_rq->nr_running; else - nr_running = this_rq->prev_nr_running[this_cpu]; + *nr_running = this_rq->prev_nr_running[this_cpu]; - busiest = NULL; - max_load = 1; - for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) { - if (!cpu_online(i)) - continue; + for (n = 0; n < numnodes; n++) { + nd[n].busiest_cpu_load = -1; + nd[n].total_load = 0; + } - rq_src = cpu_rq(i); - if (idle || (rq_src->nr_running < this_rq->prev_nr_running[i])) - load = rq_src->nr_running; + /* compute all node loads and save their max cpu loads */ + for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) { + if (!cpu_online(cpu)) continue; + node = &nd[cpu_to_node(cpu)]; + src_rq = cpu_rq(cpu); + if (idle || (src_rq->nr_running < this_rq->prev_nr_running[cpu])) + load = src_rq->nr_running; else - load = this_rq->prev_nr_running[i]; - this_rq->prev_nr_running[i] = rq_src->nr_running; - - if ((load > max_load) && (rq_src != this_rq)) { - busiest = rq_src; - max_load = load; + load = this_rq->prev_nr_running[cpu]; + this_rq->prev_nr_running[cpu] = src_rq->nr_running; + node->total_load += load; + if (load > node->busiest_cpu_load) { + node->busiest_cpu_load = load; + node->busiest_cpu = cpu; } } - if (likely(!busiest)) - goto out; + busiest_cpu = nd[this_node].busiest_cpu; + if (busiest_cpu != this_cpu) { + if (!CPUS_BALANCED(nd[this_node].busiest_cpu_load,*nr_running)) { + busiest_rq = cpu_rq(busiest_cpu); + this_rq->wait_node = -1; + goto out; + } + } - *imbalance = (max_load - nr_running) / 2; +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + max_avg_load = -1; + for (n = 0; n < numnodes; n++) { + node = &nd[n]; + system_load += node->total_load; + node->average_load = node->total_load*LOADSCALE/node_ncpus(n); + if (node->average_load > max_avg_load) { + max_avg_load = node->average_load; + busiest_node = n; + } + } - /* It needs an at least ~25% imbalance to trigger balancing. */ - if (!idle && (*imbalance < (max_load + 3)/4)) { - busiest = NULL; + /* Exit if not enough imbalance on any remote node. */ + if ((busiest_node == this_node) || (max_avg_load <= LOADSCALE) || + NODES_BALANCED(max_avg_load,nd[this_node].average_load)) { + this_rq->wait_node = -1; goto out; } - nr_running = double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest, this_cpu, idle, nr_running); - /* - * Make sure nothing changed since we checked the - * runqueue length. - */ - if (busiest->nr_running <= nr_running + 1) { - spin_unlock(&busiest->lock); - busiest = NULL; + busiest_cpu = nd[busiest_node].busiest_cpu; + avg_load = system_load*LOADSCALE/num_online_cpus(); + /* Wait longer before stealing if own node's load is average. */ + if (NODES_BALANCED(avg_load,nd[this_node].average_load)) + steal_delay = NODE_DELAY_BUSY; + else + steal_delay = NODE_DELAY_IDLE; + /* if we have a new most loaded node: just mark it */ + if (this_rq->wait_node != busiest_node) { + this_rq->wait_node = busiest_node; + this_rq->wait_time = jiffies; + goto out; + } else + /* old most loaded node: check if waited enough */ + if (jiffies - this_rq->wait_time < steal_delay) + goto out; + + if ((!CPUS_BALANCED(nd[busiest_node].busiest_cpu_load,*nr_running))) { + busiest_rq = cpu_rq(busiest_cpu); + this_rq->wait_node = -1; } -out: - return busiest; +#endif + out: + return busiest_rq; } /* @@ -758,16 +864,21 @@ */ static void load_balance(runqueue_t *this_rq, int idle) { - int imbalance, idx, this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); + int imbalance, nr_running, idx, this_cpu = smp_processor_id(); runqueue_t *busiest; prio_array_t *array; struct list_head *head, *curr; task_t *tmp; - busiest = find_busiest_queue(this_rq, this_cpu, idle, &imbalance); + busiest = find_busiest_queue(this_cpu, idle, &nr_running); if (!busiest) goto out; + imbalance = (busiest->nr_running - nr_running)/2; + + nr_running = double_lock_balance(this_rq, busiest, this_cpu, idle, nr_running); + if (busiest->nr_running <= nr_running + 1) + goto out_unlock; /* * We first consider expired tasks. Those will likely not be * executed in the near future, and they are most likely to @@ -839,10 +950,10 @@ * frequency and balancing agressivity depends on whether the CPU is * idle or not. * - * busy-rebalance every 250 msecs. idle-rebalance every 1 msec. (or on + * busy-rebalance every 200 msecs. idle-rebalance every 1 msec. (or on * systems with HZ=100, every 10 msecs.) */ -#define BUSY_REBALANCE_TICK (HZ/4 ?: 1) +#define BUSY_REBALANCE_TICK (HZ/5 ?: 1) #define IDLE_REBALANCE_TICK (HZ/1000 ?: 1) static inline void idle_tick(runqueue_t *rq) @@ -2110,7 +2221,8 @@ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags); p = req->task; - cpu_dest = __ffs(p->cpus_allowed); + cpu_dest = __ffs(p->cpus_allowed & cpu_online_map); + rq_dest = cpu_rq(cpu_dest); repeat: cpu_src = task_cpu(p); --------------Boundary-00=_3GPB2TAF7WTB3B0PZWAZ-- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/