Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:05:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:05:55 -0500 Received: from fmr04.intel.com ([143.183.121.6]:57280 "EHLO caduceus.sc.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:05:53 -0500 Message-Id: <200212181913.gBIJDeP13012@unix-os.sc.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: mgross Reply-To: mgross@unix-os.sc.intel.com Organization: SSG Intel To: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Multithreaded coredump patch where? Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:19:33 -0800 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: Roberto Fichera , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <5.2.0.9.0.20021216182325.042a2b60@mail.isolaweb.it> <200212170015.gBH0FXP13878@unix-os.sc.intel.com> <1040127295.10437.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> In-Reply-To: <1040127295.10437.5.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 835 Lines: 22 On Tuesday 17 December 2002 04:14 am, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 22:21, mgross wrote: > > I don't know if there is any plan to back port Ingo's version of this > > feature to 2.4.x > > the current Red Hat Rawhide kernels have an attempt for a backport but > it's not fully working right yet unfortionatly Is this because you are doing both the NPTL kernel support and the multi-threaded core dump in a combined back port making the effort more complex? What types of issues are you seeing with the back port? I'm just wondering. These are cool features. --mgross - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/