Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:22:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:22:20 -0500 Received: from 12-231-249-244.client.attbi.com ([12.231.249.244]:17425 "HELO kroah.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:22:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 11:27:40 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Jaroslav Kysela Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: ALSA update Message-ID: <20021218192740.GC32190@kroah.com> References: <20021218182135.GD31197@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 996 Lines: 24 On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 08:17:55PM +0100, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > Not much. We have 9 #ifdef's and all trying to resolve the conflicts with > new function prototypes which is difficult to replace with defines or > inline functions. Perhaps, you'll have an idea to solve this problem. Short of keeping a 2.4 version and a 2.5/2.6 version, no, I do not have any ideas, sorry. The USB core has changed a lot between those two trees, as you know. > For us, it's very important to have only one code base for all kernels, > but on the other hand, we're trying to leave the 2.2/2.4 kernel code > specific parts separate in our CVS repository if possible. Then you might want to leave the OLD_USB stuff out of the 2.5 kernel :) thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/