Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:44:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:44:02 -0500 Received: from [213.171.53.133] ([213.171.53.133]:58633 "EHLO gulipin.miee.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:43:37 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 22:51:27 +0300 (MSK) From: "Ruslan U. Zakirov" To: Jaroslav Kysela cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: ALSA update In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2450 Lines: 65 On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > On Wed, 18 Dec 2002, Greg KH wrote: > > > > ChangeSet 1.885.1.5, 2002/12/18 10:13:22+01:00, perex@suse.cz > > > > > > > > > diff -Nru a/sound/usb/usbaudio.c b/sound/usb/usbaudio.c > > > --- a/sound/usb/usbaudio.c Wed Dec 18 10:07:34 2002 > > > +++ b/sound/usb/usbaudio.c Wed Dec 18 10:07:34 2002 > > > @@ -526,7 +526,11 @@ > > > /* > > > * complete callback from data urb > > > */ > > > +#ifndef OLD_USB > > > static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb *urb, struct pt_regs *regs) > > > +#else > > > +static void snd_complete_urb(struct urb *urb) > > > +#endif > > > { > > > snd_urb_ctx_t *ctx = (snd_urb_ctx_t *)urb->context; > > > snd_usb_substream_t *subs = ctx->subs; > > > @@ -551,7 +555,11 @@ > > > /* > > > * complete callback from sync urb > > > */ > > > +#ifndef OLD_USB > > > static void snd_complete_sync_urb(struct urb *urb, struct pt_regs *regs) > > > +#else > > > +static void snd_complete_sync_urb(struct urb *urb) > > > +#endif > > > { > > > snd_urb_ctx_t *ctx = (snd_urb_ctx_t *)urb->context; > > > snd_usb_substream_t *subs = ctx->subs; > > > @@ -583,6 +591,9 @@ > > > > Ick, you're kidding me, right? Why do this? Are you trying to keep a > > common code base with 2.4 and 2.5 USB drivers? If so, I don't recommend > > it, as the code will be sprinkled with these ifdef's... > > Not much. We have 9 #ifdef's and all trying to resolve the conflicts with > new function prototypes which is difficult to replace with defines or > inline functions. Perhaps, you'll have an idea to solve this problem. > > For us, it's very important to have only one code base for all kernels, > but on the other hand, we're trying to leave the 2.2/2.4 kernel code > specific parts separate in our CVS repository if possible. > > Jaroslav > Hello, Jaroslav and All. How about other changes in new 2.5 kernel, like new PnP layer (Adam Belay) or changes with module & boot params (Rusty Russel)? There are now some changes in 2.5.52 kernel in sound/isa/opl3sa2.c that make this driver not compatible with other kernels. May be it's better split your tree in several trees for each version of kernels? Ruslan. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/