Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:01:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:01:10 -0500 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:54801 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:00:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 14:06:30 -0800 (PST) From: Andre Hedrick To: Alan Cox cc: Jeff Chua , "Adam J. Richter" , axboe@suse.de, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.5.51 ide module problem In-Reply-To: <1040251422.26521.6.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1150 Lines: 35 Jeff, Everybody cried screamed an whinned about making the chipsets modular. Now that we are going do that path, you have no choice but to wait. Use 2.4.20 and be happy. Or have FedEX write the check for it to be worked on fulltime. I do not care which, but don't bitch about progress. On 18 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 19:50, Jeff Chua wrote: > > > > On 18 Dec 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > I'll get back to 2.5 IDE things next year. For the moment I'm only > > > concerned in getting the modular stuff sorted out completely in 2.4. > > > Hopefully that will be mostly valid for 2.5 as well. > > > > I can't even boot 2.4.21-pre1 with IDE as modules. Works fine under 2.4.20 > > > > Looks like the IDE patch for 2.4.21-pre1 broke up the modules very similar > > to 2.5.51 > > Yes it did, and I plan to fix it there first > Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/