Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935242AbaKNQGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:06:48 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:52580 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934727AbaKNQGq (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:06:46 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: Icw+VVGJ53ow8ZyWaVnJV6LojybScThXA/DftMBWsk5Z 1415981205 Message-ID: <1415981203.15154.45.camel@localhost> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/7] bpf: add 'flags' attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command From: Hannes Frederic Sowa To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: "David S. Miller" , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , Daniel Borkmann , Eric Dumazet , Linux API , Network Development , LKML Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 17:06:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1415929010-9361-1-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1415929010-9361-2-git-send-email-ast@plumgrid.com> <1415967071.15154.9.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4 (3.10.4-4.fc20) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fr, 2014-11-14 at 07:33 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:11 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa > wrote: > > On Do, 2014-11-13 at 17:36 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > >> the current meaning of BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM syscall command is: > >> either update existing map element or create a new one. > >> Initially the plan was to add a new command to handle the case of > >> 'create new element if it didn't exist', but 'flags' style looks > >> cleaner and overall diff is much smaller (more code reused), so add 'flags' > >> attribute to BPF_MAP_UPDATE_ELEM command with the following meaning: > >> #define BPF_ANY 0 /* create new element or update existing */ > >> #define BPF_NOEXIST 1 /* create new element if it didn't exist */ > >> #define BPF_EXIST 2 /* update existing element */ > > > > Would a cmpxchg-alike function be handy here? > > you mean cmpxchg command in addition to > update() command ? > May be... it will have an extra 'value' argument > (key, old_value, new_value) > I don't have a use case for it yet though. I don't neither. ;) I just wanted to bring this up before user space api might get public and the additional argument might make problems. Bye, Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/