Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161833AbaKNUb1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:31:27 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.229]:54539 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161771AbaKNUb0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:31:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 15:31:23 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Petr Mladek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Jiri Kosina Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 18/23 v4] tracing: Add seq_buf_get_buf() and seq_buf_commit() helper functions Message-ID: <20141114153123.2e1d8db6@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20141114171828.GD14538@dhcp128.suse.cz> References: <20141114011244.256115061@goodmis.org> <20141114011412.977571447@goodmis.org> <20141114171828.GD14538@dhcp128.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:18:28 +0100 Petr Mladek wrote: > On Thu 2014-11-13 20:13:02, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" > > > > Add two helper functions; seq_buf_get_buf() and seq_buf_commit() that > > are used by seq_buf_path(). This makes the code similar to the > > seq_file: seq_path() function, and will help to be able to consolidate > > the functions between seq_file and trace_seq. > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20141104160222.644881406@goodmis.org > > > > Tested-by: Jiri Kosina > > Acked-by: Jiri Kosina > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt > > --- > > include/linux/seq_buf.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > kernel/trace/seq_buf.c | 7 +++---- > > 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/seq_buf.h b/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > index 581c1fc733c3..3e550d214187 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > +++ b/include/linux/seq_buf.h > > @@ -64,6 +64,46 @@ seq_buf_buffer_left(struct seq_buf *s) > > return s->size - s->len; > > } > > > > +/** > > + * seq_buf_get_buf - get buffer to write arbitrary data to > > + * @s: the seq_buf handle > > + * @bufp: the beginning of the buffer is stored here > > + * > > + * Return the number of bytes available in the buffer, or zero if > > + * there's no space. > > + */ > > +static inline size_t seq_buf_get_buf(struct seq_buf *s, char **bufp) > > +{ > > + WARN_ON(s->len > s->size + 1); > > + > > + if (s->len < s->size) { > > + *bufp = s->buffer + s->len; > > + return s->size - s->len; > > + } > > + > > + *bufp = NULL; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +/** > > + * seq_buf_commit - commit data to the buffer > > + * @s: the seq_buf handle > > + * @num: the number of bytes to commit > > + * > > + * Commit @num bytes of data written to a buffer previously acquired > > + * by seq_buf_get. To signal an error condition, or that the data > > + * didn't fit in the available space, pass a negative @num value. > > + */ > > +static inline void seq_buf_commit(struct seq_buf *s, int num) > > +{ > > + if (num < 0) { > > + seq_buf_set_overflow(s); > > + } else { > > + BUG_ON(s->len + num > s->size + 1); > > I thought about it more and we should probably do > > BUG_ON(s->len + num > s->size); > > "size + 1" signalizes that there was an overflow. It is a valid > value for the "len" variable. But it is not valid to commit "size + 1" > bytes into the buffer. It would mean access outside of the buffer. > > What do you think, please? I don't see anything wrong with committing an overflowed state. Note, seq_commit() allows an overflow number to go in too. But of course that's where overflow is still on the buffer. Hmm, I guess I can still make this change. The seq_commit() comment states that @num needs to be < 0 if the data did not fit, and if it is in overflow state, then it should be -1 not size + 1 (or size for the old way). -- Steve > > Best Regards, > Petr > > PS: Sigh, I wish, I saw all this problems during the first review and not > triggering another patchset version. > > > > + s->len += num; > > + } > > +} > > + > > extern __printf(2, 3) > > int seq_buf_printf(struct seq_buf *s, const char *fmt, ...); > > extern __printf(2, 0) > > diff --git a/kernel/trace/seq_buf.c b/kernel/trace/seq_buf.c > > index 9d3bb64dca31..4f35a783b82f 100644 > > --- a/kernel/trace/seq_buf.c > > +++ b/kernel/trace/seq_buf.c > > @@ -283,8 +283,8 @@ int seq_buf_putmem_hex(struct seq_buf *s, const void *mem, > > */ > > int seq_buf_path(struct seq_buf *s, const struct path *path, const char *esc) > > { > > - char *buf = s->buffer + s->len; > > - size_t size = seq_buf_buffer_left(s); > > + char *buf; > > + size_t size = seq_buf_get_buf(s, &buf); > > int res = -1; > > > > WARN_ON(s->size == 0); > > @@ -297,8 +297,7 @@ int seq_buf_path(struct seq_buf *s, const struct path *path, const char *esc) > > res = end - buf; > > } > > } > > - if (res > 0) > > - s->len += res; > > + seq_buf_commit(s, res); > > > > return res; > > } > > -- > > 2.1.1 > > > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/