Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267382AbSLSABH>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:01:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267390AbSLSABH>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:01:07 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:20440 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267382AbSLSABG>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:01:06 -0500
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <200212190008.gBJ08vw02314@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance)
To: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:08:57 -0500 (EST)
Cc: john@bradfords.org.uk (John Bradford), lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy),
       alan@redhat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, davej@codemonkey.org.uk,
       vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com
In-Reply-To: <20021218140845.L7976@work.bitmover.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Dec 18, 2002 02:08:45 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 696
Lines: 14

> I don't understand why BK is part of the conversation.  It has nothing to
> do with it.  If every time I post to this list the assumption is that it's
> "time to beat larry up about BK" then it's time for me to get off the list.
> 
> I can understand it when we're discussing BK; other than that, it's pretty
> friggin lame.  If that's what was behind your posts, Alan, there is an
> easy procmail fix for that.

It wasnt me who brought up bitkeeper
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/