Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S267398AbSLSAKr>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:10:47 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S267401AbSLSAKr>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:10:47 -0500
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:49371 "EHLO
	devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S267398AbSLSAKq>; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:10:46 -0500
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <200212190018.gBJ0Iir04816@devserv.devel.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance)
To: lm@bitmover.com (Larry McVoy)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 19:18:44 -0500 (EST)
Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), torvalds@transmeta.com,
       davej@codemonkey.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20021218161506.M7976@work.bitmover.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Dec 18, 2002 04:15:06 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 726
Lines: 19

> > > I can understand it when we're discussing BK; other than that, it's pretty
> > > friggin lame.  If that's what was behind your posts, Alan, there is an
> > > easy procmail fix for that.
> > 
> > It wasnt me who brought up bitkeeper
> 
> PLONK.  Into kernel-spam you go.  I've had it with ax grinders.

Oh dear me. Larry McVoy has flipped

I'm now being added to his spam list for *not* mentioning bitkeeper

Poor Larry, I hope has a nice christmas break, he clearly needs it

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/