Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932321AbaKPO0T (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:26:19 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:53537 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754691AbaKPO0S (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Nov 2014 09:26:18 -0500 Message-ID: <5468B3FD.20409@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 15:26:05 +0100 From: SF Markus Elfring User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julia Lawall CC: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli , Anil S Keshavamurthy , "David S. Miller" , Masami Hiramatsu , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Coccinelle Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 1/1] kprobes: Deletion of an unnecessary check before the function call "module_put" References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546899CF.8020808@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:sSw/GUXgJhsiSV9y7vVvUO5m47aEOZrjuW23v20WzhsS570+cmz HbwPMEVQhzlB9YrxLNZCRlF8TgJnZIXb6YlrEhGs1KR3aktCqB1tHZh37IfCd295O1TEia/ /8bX6u5JTRz/RQTjfaZQzGozW4+eIDEVeEwLqRNPaZ9cWm2ksZoKo3GU9O/QPnXMWosxRRA 0wowjtV5sNzR1NucjIhbQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> diff --git a/kernel/kprobes.c b/kernel/kprobes.c >> index 3995f54..f1e7d45 100644 >> --- a/kernel/kprobes.c >> +++ b/kernel/kprobes.c >> @@ -1527,8 +1527,7 @@ int register_kprobe(struct kprobe *p) >> out: >> mutex_unlock(&kprobe_mutex); >> >> - if (probed_mod) >> - module_put(probed_mod); >> + module_put(probed_mod); > > There is an out label, so please check whether the labels could not be > better positioned to avoid calling module_put when it is not needed. I do not see refactoring opportunities around jump labels in this use case for the implementation of the register_kprobe() function so far because the mutex_unlock() function must be called. Would you like to suggest any other source code fine-tuning? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/