Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:02:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:02:01 -0500 Received: from h-64-105-34-78.SNVACAID.covad.net ([64.105.34.78]:32131 "EHLO freya.yggdrasil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:02:00 -0500 From: "Adam J. Richter" Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:08:45 -0800 Message-Id: <200212190108.RAA03649@adam.yggdrasil.com> To: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk Subject: Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1332 Lines: 31 Russell King wrote: >I'm waiting for the kernel bugzilla to become useful - currently the >record for me has been: > >3 bugs total >3 bugs for serial code for drivers I don't maintain, reassigned to mbligh. > >This means I write (choose one): > >1. non-buggy code (highly unlikely) >2. code no one tests >3. code people do test but report via other means (eg, email, irc) > >If it's (3), which it seems to be, it means that bugzilla is failing to >do its job properly, which is most unfortunate. I don't currently use bugzilla (just due to inertia), but the whole world doesn't have to switch to something overnight in order for that facility to end up saving more time and resources than it has cost. Adoption can grow gradually, and it's probably easier to work out bugs (in bugzilla) and improvements that way anyhow. Adam J. Richter __ ______________ 575 Oroville Road adam@yggdrasil.com \ / Milpitas, California 95035 +1 408 309-6081 | g g d r a s i l United States of America "Free Software For The Rest Of Us." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/