Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:44:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:44:08 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:25834 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 20:44:07 -0500 Subject: RE: 15000+ processes -- poor performance ?! From: Alan Cox To: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" Cc: "'Till Immanuel Patzschke'" , lse-tech , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 19 Dec 2002 02:31:28 +0000 Message-Id: <1040265088.27221.7.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 20 On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 01:04, Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky wrote: > > > > > forgot the kernel version (2.4.20aa1)... > > You need the O(1) scheduler; not sure if aa has it or not; if not, lots of > processes will suck your machine. I think -ac has the O(1) scheduler, or try > 2.5. The old scheduler is pretty cool but not as scalable as the new one. > > If it has it ... well, I have no idea - maybe Robert Love would know. He's running the -aa kernel, which has all the right bits for this too. In fact in some ways for very large memory boxes its probably the better variant - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/