Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:04:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:04:44 -0500 Received: from filesrv1.baby-dragons.com ([199.33.245.55]:24849 "EHLO filesrv1.baby-dragons.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 17:04:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 14:04:21 -0800 (PST) From: "Mr. James W. Laferriere" To: Rik van Riel cc: Linux Kernel Maillist Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac7 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello Rik , As an aside to the below conversation . Is there a URL/doc/... that gives basic tuning examples for various types workloads ? Tia , JimL On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: ...snip... > > It's still reluctant to shrink cache. I'm hitting I/O saturation > > at 20 jobs vs 30 with ac5. (difference seems to be the delta in > > space taken by cache.. ~same space shows as additional swap volume). > > Indeed, to "fix" that we'll need to work at refill_inactive(). > > However, I am very much against tuning the VM for one particular > workload. If you can show me that this problem also happens under > other workloads we can work at changing it, but I don't think it's ...snip... +----------------------------------------------------------------+ | James W. Laferriere | System Techniques | Give me VMS | | Network Engineer | 25416 22nd So | Give me Linux | | babydr@baby-dragons.com | DesMoines WA 98198 | only on AXP | +----------------------------------------------------------------+ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/