Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:04:07 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi>
To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
        sre@debian.org, sre@ring0.de,
        kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
        freemangordon@abv.bg, bcousson@baylibre.com, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller
Message-ID: <20141117150407.GP8907@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk>
References: <20141116075928.GA9763@amd>
 <20141117101553.GA21151@amd>
 <20141117145545.GC7046@atomide.com>
 <201411171601.32311@pali>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <201411171601.32311@pali>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

Hi Pali,

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:01:31PM +0100, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> On Monday 17 November 2014 15:55:46 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> [141117 02:17]:
> > > On Mon 2014-11-17 11:09:45, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > On Monday 17 November 2014 11:05:19 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Mon 2014-11-17 09:43:19, Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday 16 November 2014 08:59:28 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > > > > > For device tree people: Yes, I know I'll have to
> > > > > > > create file in documentation, but does the binding
> > > > > > > below look acceptable?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'll clean up driver code a bit more, remove the
> > > > > > > printks. Anything else obviously wrong?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think that this patch is probably not good and
> > > > > > specially not for n900. adp1653 should be registered
> > > > > > throw omap3 isp camera subsystem which does not have
> > > > > > DT support yet.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Can you explain?
> > > > > 
> > > > > adp1653 is independend device on i2c bus, and we have
> > > > > kernel driver for it (unlike rest of n900 camera
> > > > > system). Just now it is unusable due to lack of DT
> > > > > binding. It has two functions, LED light and a camera
> > > > > flash; yes, the second one should be integrated to the
> > > > > rest of camera system, but that is not yet merged. That
> > > > > should not prevent us from merging DT support for the
> > > > > flash, so that this part can be tested/maintained.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok. When ISP camera subsystem has DT support somebody will
> > > > modify n900 DT to add camera flash from adp1653 to ISP...
> > > > I believe it will not be hard.
> > > 
> > > Exactly. And yes, I'd like to get complete camera support
> > > for n900 merged. But first step is "make sure existing
> > > support does not break".
> > 
> > There's nothing stopping us from initializing the camera code
> > from pdata-quirks.c for now to keep it working. Certainly the
> > binding should be added to the driver, but that removes a
> > dependency to the legacy booting mode if things are otherwise
> > working.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Tony
> 
> Tony, legacy board code for n900 is not in mainline tree. And 
> that omap3 camera subsystem for n900 is broken since 3.5 
> kernel... (both Front and Back camera on n900 show only green 
> picture).

Can you capture raw bayer images correctly? I assume green means YUV buffers
that are all zero.

Do you know more specifically which patch breaks it?

-- 
Regards,

Sakari Ailus
e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi	XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/