Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:57:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:57:32 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:31435 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 01:57:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 23:05:27 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: "Timothy D. Witham" cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Freezing.. (was Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance) Message-ID: <747650000.1040281526@titus> In-Reply-To: <1040276082.1476.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200212181908.gBIJ82M03155@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1040276082.1476.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 23 > Related thought: > > One of the things that we are trying to do is to automate > patch testing. > > The PLM (www.osdl.org/plm) takes every patch that it gets > and does a quick "Does it compile test". Right now there > are only 4 kernel configuration files that we try but we are > going to be adding more. We could expand this to 100's > if needed as it would just be a matter of adding additional > hardware to make the compiles go faster in parallel. URL doesn't seem to work. But would be cool if you had one SMP config, one UP with IO/APIC, and one without IO/APIC. I seem to break the middle one whenever I write a patch ;-( M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/