Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:55:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:55:14 -0500 Received: from pa90.banino.sdi.tpnet.pl ([213.76.211.90]:44814 "EHLO alf.amelek.gda.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 04:55:13 -0500 Subject: parport_serial link order bug, NetMos support To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:03:12 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL95 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: From: Marek Michalkiewicz Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1986 Lines: 44 Hello, I've been trying (for quite a long time now, starting around the time when 2.4.19 was released) to submit the following patches into the 2.4.x kernel: http://www.amelek.gda.pl/linux-patches/2.4.20-pre9/00_parport_serial http://www.amelek.gda.pl/linux-patches/2.4.20-pre9/01_netmos (generated for 2.4.20-pre9, but apply cleanly to 2.4.20-final too, 00_parport_serial needs to be applied before 01_netmos). The first patch fixes a bug with CONFIG_PARPORT_SERIAL=y (moves the parport_serial driver - must be initialised after serial). This bug has been fixed in 2.5.x some time ago, by moving the serial driver to its own directory - a change that looks too intrusive for 2.4.x, moving parport_serial instead looks much safer. This patch is quite big, but most of it is just moving parport_serial.c from drivers/parport/ to drivers/char/ without changing a single line. Now parport_serial is after serial, but before any drivers that need parport already initialised: lp, block (paride), net (plip). The second patch adds support for NetMos PCI I/O cards, based on a >1 year old 2.5.x patch by Tim Waugh. I've been using a few NM9835-based cards in production use, no problems so far (in 3 machines, one of them is my server with two permanent 115.2k PPP connections, which have seen quite a few gigabytes of traffic). Now that 2.4.21-pre2 is out, I'd like to ask - are there any good reasons why these patches are not going in? There has been some discussion, but no conclusion either way (not accepted, and not rejected). Are there any known problems, like some NM9835 chips burn and explode when run under Linux and I've just been lucky? ;) Please, I would really appreciate to see these patches in 2.4.21. Thanks, Marek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/