Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753186AbaKRAXN (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:23:13 -0500 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:58720 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483AbaKRAXM (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:23:12 -0500 Message-ID: <1416270188.18197.16.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: lustre: mdc: use __FMODE_EXEC macro From: Juston Reply-To: 20141117224616.GI4905@mwanda To: Dan Carpenter Cc: oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, andreas.dilger@intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, HPDD-discuss@ml01.01.org Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:23:08 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20141117224616.GI4905@mwanda> References: <1416263028-16026-1-git-send-email-juston.h.li@gmail.com> <20141117224616.GI4905@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 01:46 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:23:48PM -0800, Juston Li wrote: > > FMODE_EXEC is type fmode_t but is used in operations > > with integers which leads to sparse warnings: > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_lib.c:198:21: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer > > drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/mdc/mdc_locks.c:300:49: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer > > > > Fix by using __FMODE_EXEC macro defined in fs.h. > > > > Note the same warnings occurs with other fmode flags > > here but they don't have a corresponding int macro. > > > > When are FMODE_EXEC and __FMODE_EXEC not defined? I think they're > always defined. I don't understand the point of these ifdefs. I guess > maybe they are for compatability with obsolete kernels? > > regards, > dan carpenter > Seems to be the case. Looked at some old commits (2.6.17) and found FMODE_EXEC was mainlined to allow lustre to be installed on a vanilla kernel. Since you pointed it out, if we are dealing with compatability with obselete kernels, __FMODE_EXEC was added later in 2.6.38. Wondering if I should address the case where FMODE_EXEC is defined but __FMODE_EXEC isn't since I currently only check __FMODE_EXEC. Regards, Juston Li -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/