Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753418AbaKRAbs (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:31:48 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:36426 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752134AbaKRAbr (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Nov 2014 19:31:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 01:31:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Borislav Petkov cc: Stephane Eranian , x86-ml , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@redhat.com, kan.liang@intel.com, maria.n.dimakopoulou@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/13] perf/x86: add syfs entry to disable HT bug workaround In-Reply-To: <20141117235841.GD25157@pd.tnic> Message-ID: References: <1416251225-17721-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <1416251225-17721-14-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> <20141117230232.GC25157@pd.tnic> <20141117235841.GD25157@pd.tnic> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Nov 2014, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:38:14AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Well a bitmask is a pretty indescriptive item as well. Putting my user > > hat on: Where is the documentation for the bits? > > $ cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/bugs > 0xXXXXXX - currently enabled workarounds are the set bits. > bit 0: workaround for bug#blabla > bit 1: workaround for bug#1 > bit 2: workaround for bug#2; remember to do before disabling workaround > ... > bits n-63 are reserved, cannot be set and RAZ. You sure that 64 are enough? You need to create stable but numbers, i.e. each bug gets a fixed but number whethr it affects the machine or not. Otherwise you will drive admins completely nuts. > This will be issued when user cats the sysfs file. That might work as well, though you want that to be: /sys/devices/system/cpu/bugs/ /sys/devices/system/cpu/bugs/status /sys/devices/system/cpu/bugs/enable_workaround /sys/devices/system/cpu/bugs/disable_workaround The latter two take a bit number rather than a magic mask. So while it looks less effort to implement and extend in the first place I think, that a bit of infrastructure work will make the explicit scheme I proposed before a no brainer to maintain and extend, but I cannot judge what's more intuitive to use. Thanks, tglx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/