Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:18:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:18:21 -0500 Received: from mercury.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.37]:6160 "EHLO mercury.nildram.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 10 Feb 2001 18:18:07 -0500 Message-ID: <3A85CC1A.7020309@magenta-netlogic.com> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 23:17:46 +0000 From: Tony Hoyle Organization: Magenta Logic User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.1 i686; en-US; 0.8) Gecko/20010209 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dr. Kelsey Hudson" CC: Alan Chandler , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: spelling of disc (disk) in /devfs In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > It had always been my assumption that non-optical storage media used the > 'disk' spelling, whereas optical media, such as CDs, DVDs, and MO, were > reffered to using the 'disc' spelling. I can remember having this argument back in the days of the BBC Micro. The BBC is the only machine I have ever seen that used 'disc'... In those days I assumed it was correct. Over time, I came to accept that we used 'disk' for the same reasons we use 'program' rather than 'programme'. I haven't heard anyone in the UK spell it 'disc' for years.... When I last tried devfs (around the 2.4.0test era - a short and painful experience, but that's another story) I was confused by the use of 'disc'. IMHO it should be changed, because it's simply wrong, even in england (so please stop blaming us for it!). Tony -- "User DATA\tmh cannot be created because DATA\tmh does not exist." Windows -- Great UI huh? tmh@magenta-netlogic.com http://www.nothing-on.tv - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/