Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:28:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:28:55 -0500 Received: from cc125153-a.ensch1.ov.home.nl ([217.120.134.19]:10488 "HELO luggage.discworld.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 07:28:54 -0500 Message-ID: <3E01BD20.4080608@home.nl> Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 13:35:44 +0100 From: Robert Boermans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Kot CC: Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.24-rc1 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 885 Lines: 33 Pawel Kot wrote: >Is it the following chunk? (I can't find anything more appropriate) >@@ -1378,7 +1378,8 @@ > return; > > case X86_VENDOR_AMD: >- init_amd(c); >+ if(init_amd(c)) >+ return; > return; > > case X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR: >What does it fix? > >pkot > > i assume there was more to the patch? i mean first it did init_amd(c) and then return now it does init_amd(c) and returns in the if or right on the next line, so that's the same with extra bloat. confused, Robert Boermans. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/