Message-ID: <546B5675.4060902@suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:23:49 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
CC: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
        x86@kernel.org, kpatch@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Kernel Live Patching
References: <1416187764-3341-1-git-send-email-sjenning@redhat.com> <5469888E.3090501@hitachi.com> <20141117145450.GA2314@cerebellum.variantweb.net>
In-Reply-To: <20141117145450.GA2314@cerebellum.variantweb.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On 11/17/2014, 03:54 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:33:02PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Hmm, btw, "LP" and "LPC" remind me line-printer and LPC bus :(
>> Can we use LKP (Live Kernel Patching) or KLP (Kernel Live Patching) instead ?
> 
> Jiri S also mentioned this so I guess it is a common sentiment :)  He
> suggested "lip" but I think I like "klp" better?  Jiri S sound good?

Definitely, I like both lkp and klp.

-- 
js
suse labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/