Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:2314 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 16:35:50 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200212192155.gBJLtV6k003254@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Dedicated kernel bug database To: rddunlap@osdl.org (Randy.Dunlap) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:55:31 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Randy.Dunlap" at Dec 19, 2002 01:32:57 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1034 Lines: 25 > | > I'm not trying to discourage you - just raising a potential gotcha. > | > | Overall, though, would you rather be presented with a list of > | categories, or a list of people and what parts of the code they > | maintain. Personally, I think that a list of people is more > | intuitive, rather than an abstract list of categories, but I could be > | wrong. > > Do we have anyone targeted for interrupt routing problems (PIC, IO APIC, > ACPI, etc.)? No. I nominate Alan :-). OK, I see your point, but no bug system will ever be perfect. Does that mean there is no point in trying to make a better one? If everybody really thinks it's a waste of time, I won't bother. It just seemed to me that we need something less generic than Bugzilla. Maybe I am wrong, I don't know. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/