Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:06:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:06:13 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:4612 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:06:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:55:46 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Andre Hedrick , Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Message-ID: <20021218235546.GD705@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1040137976.20018.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1040137976.20018.3.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 887 Lines: 21 Hi! > > Are you serious about moving of the banging we currently do on 0x80? > > If so, I have a P4 development board with leds to monitor all the lower io > > ports and can decode for you. > > Different thing - int 0x80 syscall not i/o port 80. I've done I/O port > 80 (its very easy), but requires we set up some udelay constants with an > initial safety value right at boot (which we should do - we udelay > before it is initialised) Actually that would be nice -- I have leds on 0x80 too ;-). Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/