Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932143AbaKSNGp (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:06:45 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com ([209.85.213.182]:45736 "EHLO mail-ig0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754051AbaKSNGl (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:06:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20141118222936.GB20945@cerebellum.variantweb.net> References: <000001d0030d$0505aaa0$0f10ffe0$%yang@samsung.com> <20141118222936.GB20945@cerebellum.variantweb.net> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 21:06:41 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: frontswap: invalidate expired data on a dup-store failure From: Weijie Yang To: Seth Jennings Cc: Weijie Yang , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Andrew Morton , Dan Streetman , Minchan Kim , Bob Liu , =?UTF-8?B?5p2O5bi45Z2k?= , Linux-MM , Linux-Kernel Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Seth Jennings wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:51:36PM +0800, Weijie Yang wrote: >> If a frontswap dup-store failed, it should invalidate the expired page >> in the backend, or it could trigger some data corruption issue. >> Such as: >> 1. use zswap as the frontswap backend with writeback feature >> 2. store a swap page(version_1) to entry A, success >> 3. dup-store a newer page(version_2) to the same entry A, fail >> 4. use __swap_writepage() write version_2 page to swapfile, success >> 5. zswap do shrink, writeback version_1 page to swapfile >> 6. version_2 page is overwrited by version_1, data corrupt. > > Good catch! > >> >> This patch fixes this issue by invalidating expired data immediately >> when meet a dup-store failure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Weijie Yang >> --- >> mm/frontswap.c | 4 +++- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/frontswap.c b/mm/frontswap.c >> index c30eec5..f2a3571 100644 >> --- a/mm/frontswap.c >> +++ b/mm/frontswap.c >> @@ -244,8 +244,10 @@ int __frontswap_store(struct page *page) >> the (older) page from frontswap >> */ >> inc_frontswap_failed_stores(); >> - if (dup) >> + if (dup) { >> __frontswap_clear(sis, offset); >> + frontswap_ops->invalidate_page(type, offset); > > Looking at __frontswap_invalidate_page(), should we do > inc_frontswap_invalidates() too? If so, maybe we should just call > __frontswap_invalidate_page(). The frontswap_invalidate_page() is for swap_entry_free, while here is an inner ops for dup-store, so I think there is no need for inc_frontswap_invalidates(). > Thanks, > Seth > >> + } >> } >> if (frontswap_writethrough_enabled) >> /* report failure so swap also writes to swap device */ >> -- >> 1.7.0.4 >> >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in >> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, >> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . >> Don't email: email@kvack.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/