Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:08:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:07:14 -0500 Received: from [195.39.17.254] ([195.39.17.254]:4100 "EHLO Elf.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 17:06:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 00:53:27 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: dean gaudet Cc: Linus Torvalds , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@transmeta.com Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance Message-ID: <20021218235327.GC705@elf.ucw.cz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 975 Lines: 24 Hi! > > It's not as good as a pure user-mode solution using tsc could be, but > > we've seen the kinds of complexities that has with multi-CPU systems, and > > they are so painful that I suspect the sysenter approach is a lot more > > palatable even if it doesn't allow for the absolute best theoretical > > numbers. > > don't many of the multi-CPU problems with tsc go away because you've got a > per-cpu physical page for the vsyscall? > > i.e. per-cpu tsc epoch and scaling can be set on that page. Problem is that cpu's can randomly drift +/- 100 clocks or so... Not nice at all. Pavel -- Worst form of spam? Adding advertisment signatures ala sourceforge.net. What goes next? Inserting advertisment *into* email? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/