Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932310AbaKSPwo (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:52:44 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com ([209.85.212.179]:35983 "EHLO mail-wi0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932279AbaKSPwm (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:52:42 -0500 From: Daniel Thompson To: Will Deacon , Russell King Cc: Daniel Thompson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , patches@linaro.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, John Stultz , Sumit Semwal Subject: [PATCH] arm: perf: Prevent wraparound during overflow Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:52:26 +0000 Message-Id: <1416412346-8759-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org If the overflow threshold for a counter is set above or near the 0xffffffff boundary then the kernel may lose track of the overflow causing only events that occur *after* the overflow to be recorded. Specifically the problem occurs when the value of the performance counter overtakes its original programmed value due to wrap around. Typical solutions to this problem are either to avoid programming in values likely to be overtaken or to treat the overflow bit as the 33rd bit of the counter. Its somewhat fiddly to refactor the code to correctly handle the 33rd bit during irqsave sections (context switches for example) so instead we take the simpler approach of avoiding values likely to be overtaken. We set the limit to half of max_period because this matches the limit imposed in __hw_perf_event_init(). This causes a doubling of the interrupt rate for large threshold values, however even with a very fast counter ticking at 4GHz the interrupt rate would only be ~1Hz. Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson --- Notes: There is similar code in the arm64 tree which retains the assumptions of the original arm code regarding 32-bit wide performance counters. If this patch doesn't get beaten up during review I'll also share a similar patch for arm64. arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c index 266cba46db3e..b50a770f8c99 100644 --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c @@ -115,8 +115,14 @@ int armpmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event) ret = 1; } - if (left > (s64)armpmu->max_period) - left = armpmu->max_period; + /* + * Limit the maximum period to prevent the counter value + * from overtaking the one we are about to program. In + * effect we are reducing max_period to account for + * interrupt latency (and we are being very conservative). + */ + if (left > (s64)(armpmu->max_period >> 1)) + left = armpmu->max_period >> 1; local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, (u64)-left); -- 1.9.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/