Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:16:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:16:27 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:27116 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:16:26 -0500 Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance From: Alan Cox To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linus Torvalds , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ulrich Drepper , "Nakajima, Jun" , Matti Aarnio , Hugh Dickins , Dave Jones , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: <20021218234512.GA705@elf.ucw.cz> References: <3DFFED33.2020201@transmeta.com> <20021218234512.GA705@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Date: 20 Dec 2002 03:05:15 +0000 Message-Id: <1040353515.30925.16.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 618 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2002-12-18 at 23:45, Pavel Machek wrote: > IIRC, segment 0x40 was special in BIOS days, and some APM bioses > blindly access 0x40 even from protected mode (windows have segment > 0x40 with base 0x400....) Is that issue you are hitting? Well the spec says it is not special. Windows leaves it pointing to 0x400 and if you don't do that your APM doesn't work. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/