Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:34:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:34:10 -0500 Received: from svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com ([24.136.46.5]:57096 "EHLO svr-ganmtc-appserv-mgmt.ncf.coxexpress.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 21:34:10 -0500 Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - prio_bonus_ratio From: Robert Love To: Andrew Morton Cc: Con Kolivas , linux kernel mailing list In-Reply-To: <3E0263EA.2BB9C89@digeo.com> References: <200212200850.32886.conman@kolivas.net> <1040337982.2519.45.camel@phantasy> <3E0253D9.94961FB@digeo.com> <1040341293.2521.71.camel@phantasy> <3E0263EA.2BB9C89@digeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1040352135.2645.97.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 Date: 19 Dec 2002 21:42:16 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 681 Lines: 18 On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 19:27, Andrew Morton wrote: > Prefixing all the names with "tune_" would suit, too. I have no problem with this. Keeping the names in all caps rings "preprocessor define" to me, which in fact they are - but only insomuch as they point to a real variable. So I dislike that. Personally I like them as normal variable names... don't you do the same in the VM code as well? But tune_foo is fine.. Robert Love - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/