Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:13:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:13:07 -0500 Received: from franka.aracnet.com ([216.99.193.44]:53695 "EHLO franka.aracnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:13:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 19:21:04 -0800 From: "Martin J. Bligh" To: "Randy.Dunlap" cc: Hanna Linder , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Dedicated kernel bug database Message-ID: <58550000.1040354463@titus> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1118 Lines: 29 >| >> There are a bunch of categories that aren't really "owned" as such, >| >> and default to khoa or myself. Those are really good candidates to >| >> steal ... they'll be owned by bugme-janitors soon to make this more >| >> obvious ... >| > >| > OK. Which categories are not owned? Anything with you or khoa as >| > owners? >| >| More or less, yes. There are a couple of categories I really own, eg >| NUMA/discontigmem, and I'll probably look after ia32 specific bugs >| unless Linus wants his category back ;-) >| >| Will switch to bugme-janitors in a few days, then will all be much more >| obvious > > What does this last sentence mean? Instead of categories that don't have a "real" owner defaulting back to me or Khoa, they'll go to bugme-janitors, which is an alias. That way we'll have better coverage, and it'll be obvious which things aren't really owned. M - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/