Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:29:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:29:06 -0500 Received: from [81.2.122.30] ([81.2.122.30]:2564 "EHLO darkstar.example.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 04:29:05 -0500 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200212200948.gBK9mrXh000326@darkstar.example.net> Subject: Re: Dedicated kernel bug database To: mbligh@aracnet.com (Martin J. Bligh) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 09:48:53 +0000 (GMT) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <79780000.1040355621@titus> from "Martin J. Bligh" at Dec 19, 2002 07:40:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1584 Lines: 46 [CC list trimmed] > > I've got loads of ideas about how we could build a better bug database > > Go ahead, knock yourself out. Come back when you're done. Not sure what you mean. I do intend to start coding a new bug database system today, and I'll announce it on the list when it's ready. If nobody likes it, I wasted my time. > > - for example, we have categories at the moment in Bugzilla. Why? We > > already have a MAINTAINERS file, so say somebody looks up the relevant > > maintainer in that list, finds them, then goes to enter a bug in > > Bugzilla. Now they have to assign it to a category, and different > > people may well assign the same bug to different categories - > > immediately making duplicate detection more difficult. > > Have you actually looked at the maintainers file? Yes. > It's a twisted mess of outdated information, Then it should be updated, that is nothing to do with Bugzilla. > in no well formated order. Looks easy enough to parse with regular expressions to me. > The category list in Bugzilla was an attempt to bring some sanity to > the structure, By adding an extra layer of abstraction. I don't agree that that helps. > though I won't claim it's perfect. We really need a 3-level tree, > but that's a fair amount of work to code. I disagree, (that we need a 3-level tree). John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/