From: "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
To: Dmitry Lavnikevich <D.Lavnikevich@sam-solutions.com>
CC: Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@diasemi.com>,
        "a.zummo@towertech.it" <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
        "rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] rtc: da9063: Fix ALARM interrupt registration.
Thread-Topic: [PATCH] rtc: da9063: Fix ALARM interrupt registration.
Thread-Index: AQHQBKgC9623rLeXOUGgGvryE55nuJxpXOmwgAAgJgCAAAuPoIABdJEAgAAUN2A=
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:23:44 +0000
Message-ID: <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7D0B49E1F@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
References: <1416477273-975-1-git-send-email-d.lavnikevich@sam-solutions.com>
 <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7D0B4836D@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
 <8A823154-DC33-4A5A-9B4B-8B0E3BCFE83C@sam-solutions.com>
 <6ED8E3B22081A4459DAC7699F3695FB7D0B483EE@SW-EX-MBX02.diasemi.com>
 <EFFD3D9B-9FA8-4DC6-9664-F62050232523@sam-solutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <EFFD3D9B-9FA8-4DC6-9664-F62050232523@sam-solutions.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On 21 November 2014 12:04 Dmitry Lavnikevich wrote: 

> > On 20Nov, 2014, at 15:43, Steve Twiss wrote:
> > On 20 November 2014 13:09 Dmitry Lavnikevich wrote:
> > [...]
> >>>
> >>> da9063-rtc da9063-rtc: Failed to request ALARM IRQ -22: -22
> >>> da9063-rtc: probe of da9063-rtc failed with error -22
> >>
> >> I have tested this patch on pfla02 board and it was ok. On which
> >> board this fail occurred?
> >
> > I am using a MCIMX6DL-SDP board -- although I the differences are in
> > my code base and not the platform in this case.
> > My apologies
> >
> > Regards,
> > Steve
> >
> > patch follows:
> […]
> 
> I see that your code also fixes the issue. And it is more consistent with
> da9055 implementation.
> So there is no need for my fix if yours is already there. Is it already accepted
> on some mainline branch?

Hi Dmitry,

No, unfortunately -- I have not had time to send it to the kernel -- it has been
in my buffer for a long time

> If not then are you going to submit it soon?

If you want to submit this, then I will support with Ack: and Tested-by:
but probably it will be quicker not to wait for me.

Regards,
Stephen

????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?