Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:09:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:09:02 -0500 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:13555 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 13:08:57 -0500 Message-ID: <3E035E7B.D3B60845@mvista.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:16:27 -0800 From: george anzinger Organization: Monta Vista Software X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12-20b i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vojtech Pavlik CC: Bjorn Helgaas , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] joydev: fix HZ->millisecond transformation References: <200212161227.38764.bjorn_helgaas@hp.com> <3E02F3EE.C1367073@mvista.com> <20021220142443.A26184@ucw.cz> <3E03526A.2AA4B685@mvista.com> <20021220183544.A26785@ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2311 Lines: 69 Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 09:24:58AM -0800, george anzinger wrote: > > Vojtech Pavlik wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 02:41:50AM -0800, george anzinger wrote: > > > > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > * fix a problem with HZ->millisecond transformation on > > > > > non-x86 archs (from 2.5 change by vojtech@suse.cz) > > > > > > > > > > Applies to 2.4.20. > > > > > > > > > > diff -Nru a/drivers/input/joydev.c b/drivers/input/joydev.c > > > > > --- a/drivers/input/joydev.c Mon Dec 16 12:16:32 2002 > > > > > +++ b/drivers/input/joydev.c Mon Dec 16 12:16:32 2002 > > > > > @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ > > > > > #define JOYDEV_MINORS 32 > > > > > #define JOYDEV_BUFFER_SIZE 64 > > > > > > > > > > +#define MSECS(t) (1000 * ((t) / HZ) + 1000 * ((t) % HZ) / HZ) > > > > Uh... > > > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > by definition this is zero, is it not? > > > > > > No, both parts of the equaition can be nonzero. > > > > I don't think so. s%HZ has to be less than HZ. Then > > dividing that by HZ should result in zero. Where is my > > thinking flawed? > > You first multiply it by 1000. But then it should read: (1000 * (t)) % HZ) / HZ But this is still zero. There is no way that ((X % HZ) / HZ) is other than zero, me thinks. > > > > Though it might be easier to say (1000 * t) / HZ, now that I think about > > > it. > > > > That overflows... As does the other if HZ is less than 1000.... > > You're right, t can be all 32 bits. What, exactly, is this code trying to do? It looks like the number is being passed to user space... > > -- > Vojtech Pavlik > SuSE Labs > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com High-res-timers: http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/ Preemption patch: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/