Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751817AbaKUSRW (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:17:22 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f48.google.com ([209.85.216.48]:60607 "EHLO mail-qa0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750785AbaKUSRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:17:19 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <546F5C27.7040004@ti.com> References: <1415941651-28962-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <1415941651-28962-4-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <20141118143005.GF24004@x1> <20141118171240.GB3003@dtor-ws> <546DF2F0.9080405@ti.com> <20141120144028.GB5809@localhost.localdomain> <546F2BA4.4000808@ti.com> <20141121131036.GA18931@localhost.localdomain> <546F5C27.7040004@ti.com> Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 19:17:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] mfd: ti_am335x_tscadc: Remove unwanted reg_se_cache save From: Johannes Pointner To: Sekhar Nori Cc: Vignesh R , Dmitry Torokhov , Lee Jones , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Benoit Cousson , Tony Lindgren , Russell King , Jonathan Cameron , Hartmut Knaack , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Lars-Peter Clausen , Peter Meerwald , Samuel Ortiz , Felipe Balbi , Brad Griffis , Sanjeev Sharma , Paul Gortmaker , Jan Kardell , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-iio , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, Robert Nelson , Richard Cochran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Before the patches were also jumps but I thought it is something Vignesh should know. Maybe there is some fix for that too? As Richard also noted, it would be nice if ti could let us know how to get the delay values right. By trial and error is IMHO not the best way. For the testing I used 3.16.7. 2014-11-21 16:37 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori : > On Friday 21 November 2014 08:41 PM, Johannes Pointner wrote: >> I tested version 4 of the patch series on a custom design and I saw >> also the jumps as described by Richard. I played a little with the >> sample delay and it got better but I couldn't completely remove the >> jumps. > > And before the patches were applied, there were no jumps at all? Which > kernel are you using for testing? > > Thanks, > Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/