Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750964AbaKWKqs (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 05:46:48 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55859 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750763AbaKWKqr (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 05:46:47 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 12:46:23 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" To: David Miller Cc: pagupta@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jasowang@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, vfalico@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com, vyasevic@redhat.com, hkchu@google.com, wuzhy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xemul@parallels.com, therbert@google.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, xii@google.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, jiri@resnulli.us, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-net 0/4] Increase the limit of tuntap queues Message-ID: <20141123104623.GA31915@redhat.com> References: <1416327778-17716-1-git-send-email-pagupta@redhat.com> <20141119.151628.768548269128919029.davem@davemloft.net> <20141119204427.GB30994@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141119204427.GB30994@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 10:44:27PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 03:16:28PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > From: Pankaj Gupta > > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:52:54 +0530 > > > > > - Accept maximum number of queues as sysctl param so that any user space > > > application like libvirt can use this value to limit number of queues. Also > > > Administrators can specify maximum number of queues by updating this sysctl > > > entry. > > > > This is the only part I don't like. > > > > Just let whoever has privileges to configure the tun device shoot > > themselves in the foot if they want to by configuring "too many" > > queues. > > > > If the virtual entity runs itself out of resources by doing something > > stupid, it's purely their problem. > > Well it will run host out of kernel, no? To clarify: At the moment attaching/detaching queues is an unpriveledged operation. Shouldn't we worry that an application can cause large allocations, and provide a way to limit these? David, could you comment on this please? > -- > MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/