Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751832AbaKWQVa (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:21:30 -0500 Received: from sauhun.de ([89.238.76.85]:43190 "EHLO pokefinder.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751253AbaKWQV2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:21:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2014 17:22:29 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Grant Likely Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alison Chaiken , Dinh Nguyen , Jan Lubbe , Alexander Sverdlin , Michael Stickel , Guenter Roeck , Dirk Behme , Alan Tull , Sascha Hauer , Michael Bohan , Ionut Nicu , Michal Simek , Matt Ranostay , Joel Becker , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pete Popov , Dan Malek , Georgi Vlaev , Pantelis Antoniou Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/8] of: i2c: Export single device registration method Message-ID: <20141123162229.GA1303@katana> References: <1414528565-10907-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1414528565-10907-6-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <20141121014631.C86D5C413E8@trevor.secretlab.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141121014631.C86D5C413E8@trevor.secretlab.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:46:31AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:02 +0200 > , Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: > > Dynamically inserting i2c client device nodes requires the use > > of a single device registration method. Rework and export it. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou >=20 > Acked-by: Grant Likely >=20 > Wolfram, this patch and the next one only make sense in conjunction with = the overlay > patches, but they don't necessarily need to be merged via the same tree. > I'm happy to take them, but am equally happy to have you take them > (assuming I ack the next patch; I haven't looked at it yet). What is > your preference? OK, now I had the time to look at it, phew. Is this targetted for 3.19? Then you can take it: Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang There is a minor conflict caused by this patch in i2c/for-next which should be easy to solve, just remove the irq handling. 2fd36c552649 2014-10-30 15:59 Laurent Pinchart o i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at= probe time If you target for later than 3.19, then we need to discuss again, because there might be other i2c core changes coming in. --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUcgnEAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm22xoQAIwYwLQpx3DWnPiYlkAL3Eg2 zTs6odMqXEvK7R7GPe8owC4rUMwfqq8wRe97wcmK8n5miNsYOm9wK2c6P1kMYo2m 4rs/+xW6zEdcuqL+SQRpVhzdtekyzqxwylWpwBdTb0hwGRgpgogkiIc+CXG1Vrds 1IpjpDTKiujbzmCTx6v3er/XxLjCn18jWfBzyZgpUEscdNHuH0n6mPilemxuuUBu M5UFpPgvlfwk+cIgQPafpR8MZeJahstbRrBzWIz/L0ReyuIrCPmkme1qA9/ym1u5 EdGxmx1sZOe8JxXWlbQ7OoSytDkK7N+fKHLmitGRESTGUAiXhhdlnmp7WB8JIVTb MS6c0iyRb5cEN7gv0Y+F1VHg8xyz+LAc9gwPxYYBR9jUEGZTQudRONcFbGB0dWLP q6mH/JmQlPZJWTC5G/fbgler9OZ4T/OP1uL46h4BulDFER/E6lZ1tMrpXHWnBlWD CHitO97/v41YYfIGosL0g9HNb2jseNi0RC30UmLK97vRhSZ1A1+3Txfi514qfTg0 DL6YVcppil/VI6zNi3gbVCQtQrs9bjigZ5tTDWptA+IoFCdL29Q48EyqzS9532wg NtTbyKN37RGSTB9Gd4IlZHgHPtFhoT5LblUqQPtZy/GNOIWmyC+toDy4JSDZ5K0y MjeHZbmVuOP3eMC+wrV/ =sIg1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/