Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 03:47:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 03:47:11 -0500 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:34057 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 21 Dec 2002 03:47:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 08:55:10 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Justin T. Gibbs" Cc: William Lee Irwin III , Janet Morgan , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic7xxx bouncing over 4G Message-ID: <20021221085510.A25881@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , "Justin T. Gibbs" , William Lee Irwin III , Janet Morgan , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200212210012.gBL0Cng21338@eng2.beaverton.ibm.com> <176730000.1040430221@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <20021221002940.GM25000@holomorphy.com> <190380000.1040432350@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> <20021221013500.GN25000@holomorphy.com> <223910000.1040435985@aslan.btc.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <223910000.1040435985@aslan.btc.adaptec.com>; from gibbs@scsiguy.com on Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:59:46PM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1485 Lines: 29 On Fri, Dec 20, 2002 at 06:59:46PM -0700, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > Those were committed in separate changes into our local Perforce > repository, but I simply don't have the patience to replicate each > individual change in Perforce into a BK change. Since all of the > Linux universe likes stuff in BK format, I do what I can to accomodate > them. perforce can export unified diffs for each changeste-equivalent right? for the sgi ptools SCCS we use internally I wrote a simple script that extracts this diff, the commit message automates a BK checking with this. This makes my job of keeping mainline in sync a lot easier and preserves the fine granuality. And it works nicely although the internal tree has some additional noise in it (kdb and HSM support). > If it wasn't such a pain to get stuff into the tree, you would see > smaller changesets. Umm, getting smaller changesets in is not such a pain :) Linus has stated very often that he prefers small patches that do one thing and I 100% agree with him. Let me suggest we heel you out to get the current update in (and I think with your latest slave_* fixes and/or Doug's scsi_scan.c revamp it's time to get it in now) and you send small, self-contained patches afterwards? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/