Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752153AbaKYJzH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:55:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com ([209.85.212.180]:42618 "EHLO mail-wi0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751837AbaKYJzB (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:55:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5473D111.9050509@gmx.de> References: <1416329275-7130-1-git-send-email-daniel.baluta@intel.com> <5473D111.9050509@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:54:59 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3h1t-IZt48va7e1MSFFnF0jYNbo Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] iio: imu: Add support for Kionix KMX61 sensor From: Daniel Baluta To: Hartmut Knaack Cc: Daniel Baluta , Jonathan Cameron , Peter Meerwald , Srinivas Pandruvada , "linux-iio@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:45 AM, Hartmut Knaack wrote: > Daniel Baluta schrieb am 18.11.2014 17:47: >> Minimal implementation for KMX61 6-axis accelerometer/magnetometer. It exports >> raw accel/magn readings together with scale and sampling frequency. >> >> Datasheet will be available at: >> http://www.kionix.com/6-axis-accelerometer-magnetometer/kmx61 >> > Finally managed to have a close look, and found a few issues. >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta >> --- >> Changes since v2: >> * mostly style fixes after comments received from Jonathan and Peter >> * http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=141564019602400&w=2 >> * implemented PM runtime and PM sleep resume/suspend hooks >> * introduced new parameter for kmx61_set_mode to help updating >> stby bits in kmx61_data. >> * use kmx6111021 instead of kmx61 for i2c_device_id. >> >> drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig | 9 + >> drivers/iio/imu/Makefile | 2 + >> drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c | 766 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 777 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig b/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig >> index 2b0e451..d675f43 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/Kconfig >> @@ -25,6 +25,15 @@ config ADIS16480 >> Say yes here to build support for Analog Devices ADIS16375, ADIS16480, >> ADIS16485, ADIS16488 inertial sensors. >> >> +config KMX61 >> + tristate "Kionix KMX61 6-axis accelerometer and magnetometer" >> + depends on I2C >> + help >> + Say Y here if you want to build a driver for Kionix KMX61 6-axis accelerometer >> + and magnetometer. >> + To compile this driver as module, choose M here: the module will be called >> + kmx61. >> + > This help text is more than 80 characters wide and may better be wrapped a bit differently. Good catch. checkpatch.pl didn't complain. >> source "drivers/iio/imu/inv_mpu6050/Kconfig" >> >> endmenu >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/Makefile b/drivers/iio/imu/Makefile >> index 114d2c1..e1e6e3d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/Makefile >> @@ -14,3 +14,5 @@ adis_lib-$(CONFIG_IIO_ADIS_LIB_BUFFER) += adis_buffer.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_IIO_ADIS_LIB) += adis_lib.o >> >> obj-y += inv_mpu6050/ >> + >> +obj-$(CONFIG_KMX61) += kmx61.o >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000..f68b3ef >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/kmx61.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,766 @@ >> +/* >> + * KMX61 - Kionix 6-axis Accelerometer/Magnetometer >> + * >> + * Copyright (c) 2014, Intel Corporation. >> + * >> + * This file is subject to the terms and conditions of version 2 of >> + * the GNU General Public License. See the file COPYING in the main >> + * directory of this archive for more details. >> + * >> + * IIO driver for KMX61 (7-bit I2C slave address 0x0E or 0x0F). >> + * >> + * TODO: buffer, interrupt, thresholds, acpi, temperature sensor >> + * >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#define KMX61_DRV_NAME "kmx61" >> + >> +#define KMX61_REG_WHO_AM_I 0x00 >> + >> +/* >> + * three 16-bit accelerometer output registers for X/Y/Z axis >> + * we use only XOUT_L as a base register, all other addresses >> + * can be obtained by applying an offset and are provided here >> + * only for clarity. >> + */ >> +#define KMX61_ACC_XOUT_L 0x0A >> +#define KMX61_ACC_XOUT_H 0x0B >> +#define KMX61_ACC_YOUT_L 0x0C >> +#define KMX61_ACC_YOUT_H 0x0D >> +#define KMX61_ACC_ZOUT_L 0x0E >> +#define KMX61_ACC_ZOUT_H 0x0F >> + >> +/* >> + * one 16-bit temperature output register >> + */ >> +#define KMX61_TEMP_L 0x10 >> +#define KMX61_TEMP_H 0x11 >> + >> +/* >> + * three 16-bit magnetometer output registers for X/Y/Z axis >> + */ >> +#define KMX61_MAG_XOUT_L 0x12 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_XOUT_H 0x13 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_YOUT_L 0x14 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_YOUT_H 0x15 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_ZOUT_L 0x16 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_ZOUT_H 0x17 >> + >> +#define KMX61_REG_ODCNTL 0x2C >> +#define KMX61_REG_STBY 0x29 >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1 0x2A >> + >> +#define KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT BIT(0) >> +#define KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT BIT(1) >> +#define KMX61_ACT_STBY_BIT BIT(7) >> + >> +#define KMX61_ALL_STBY (KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT | KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT) >> + >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL0_SHIFT 0 >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL1_SHIFT 1 >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL0_MASK 0x01 >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL1_MASK 0x02 > I don't see the benefit of separating GSEL0 and GSEL1. >> + >> +#define KMX61_REG_CTRL1_BIT_RES BIT(4) >> + >> +#define KMX61_ACC_ODR_SHIFT 0 >> +#define KMX61_MAG_ODR_SHIFT 4 >> +#define KMX61_ACC_ODR_MASK 0x0F >> +#define KMX61_MAG_ODR_MASK 0xF0 >> + >> +#define KMX61_SLEEP_DELAY_MS 2000 >> + >> +#define KMX61_CHIP_ID 0x12 >> + >> +struct kmx61_data { >> + struct i2c_client *client; >> + >> + /* serialize access to non-atomic ops, e.g set_mode */ >> + struct mutex lock; >> + u8 range; >> + u8 odr_bits; >> + >> + /* standby state */ >> + u8 acc_stby; >> + u8 mag_stby; > Why u8 instead of bool? Hmm, correct. I was thinking bitwise, but you are right. Will fix. >> + >> + /* power state */ >> + bool acc_ps; >> + bool mag_ps; >> +}; >> + >> +enum kmx61_range { >> + KMX61_RANGE_2G, >> + KMX61_RANGE_4G, >> + KMX61_RANGE_8G, >> +}; >> + >> +enum kmx61_scan { >> + KMX61_SCAN_ACC_X, >> + KMX61_SCAN_ACC_Y, >> + KMX61_SCAN_ACC_Z, >> + KMX61_SCAN_TEMP, >> + KMX61_SCAN_MAG_X, >> + KMX61_SCAN_MAG_Y, >> + KMX61_SCAN_MAG_Z, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct { >> + u16 uscale; >> + u8 gsel0; >> + u8 gsel1; >> +} kmx61_scale_table[] = { >> + {9582, 0, 0}, >> + {19163, 1, 0}, >> + {38326, 0, 1}, > Why not consolidate gsel0 and gsel1 to gsel? Then this could become u16 kmx61_scale[] = {9582, 19163, 38326} with gsel as index. True. Will fix. >> +}; >> + >> +/* KMX61 devices */ >> +#define KMX61_ACC 0x01 >> +#define KMX61_MAG 0x02 >> + >> +static const struct { >> + int val; >> + int val2; >> + u8 odr_bits; >> +} kmx61_samp_freq_table[] = { {12, 500000, 0x00}, >> + {25, 0, 0x01}, >> + {50, 0, 0x02}, >> + {100, 0, 0x03}, >> + {200, 0, 0x04}, >> + {400, 0, 0x05}, >> + {800, 0, 0x06}, >> + {1600, 0, 0x07}, >> + {0, 781000, 0x08}, >> + {1, 563000, 0x09}, >> + {3, 125000, 0x0A}, >> + {6, 250000, 0x0B} }; >> + >> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR(accel_scale_available, "0.009582 0.019163 0.038326"); >> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR(magn_scale_available, "0.001465"); >> +static IIO_CONST_ATTR_SAMP_FREQ_AVAIL( >> + "0.781000 1.563000 3.125000 6.250000 12.500000 25 50 100 200 400 800"); >> + >> +static struct attribute *kmx61_attributes[] = { >> + &iio_const_attr_accel_scale_available.dev_attr.attr, >> + &iio_const_attr_magn_scale_available.dev_attr.attr, >> + &iio_const_attr_sampling_frequency_available.dev_attr.attr, >> + NULL, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct attribute_group kmx61_attribute_group = { >> + .attrs = kmx61_attributes, >> +}; >> + >> +#define KMX61_ACC_CHAN(_axis, _index) { \ >> + .type = IIO_ACCEL, \ >> + .modified = 1, \ >> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_ ## _axis, \ >> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), \ >> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) | \ >> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ), \ >> + .address = KMX61_ACC, \ >> + .scan_index = _index, \ >> + .scan_type = { \ >> + .sign = 's', \ >> + .realbits = 12, \ >> + .storagebits = 16, \ >> + .shift = 4, \ >> + .endianness = IIO_LE, \ >> + }, \ >> +} >> + >> +#define KMX61_MAG_CHAN(_axis, _index) { \ >> + .type = IIO_MAGN, \ >> + .modified = 1, \ >> + .channel2 = IIO_MOD_ ## _axis, \ >> + .address = KMX61_MAG, \ >> + .info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW), \ >> + .info_mask_shared_by_type = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE) | \ >> + BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ), \ >> + .scan_index = _index, \ >> + .scan_type = { \ >> + .sign = 's', \ >> + .realbits = 14, \ >> + .storagebits = 16, \ >> + .shift = 2, \ >> + .endianness = IIO_LE, \ >> + }, \ >> +} >> + >> +static const struct iio_chan_spec kmx61_channels[] = { >> + KMX61_ACC_CHAN(X, KMX61_SCAN_ACC_X), >> + KMX61_ACC_CHAN(Y, KMX61_SCAN_ACC_Y), >> + KMX61_ACC_CHAN(Z, KMX61_SCAN_ACC_Z), >> + KMX61_MAG_CHAN(X, KMX61_SCAN_MAG_X), >> + KMX61_MAG_CHAN(Y, KMX61_SCAN_MAG_Y), >> + KMX61_MAG_CHAN(Z, KMX61_SCAN_MAG_Z), >> +}; >> + >> +static int kmx61_convert_freq_to_bit(int val, int val2) >> +{ >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table); i++) >> + if (val == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val && >> + val2 == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val2) >> + return kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].odr_bits; >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> +/** > Like here, the first line of the following multiline comments have one asterisk too much. I think this is the convention, when adding doxygen style documentation: http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/fs/eventpoll.c#L382 >> + * kmx61_set_mode() - set KMX61 device operating mode >> + * @data - kmx61 device private data pointer >> + * @mode - bitmask, indicating operating mode for @device >> + * @device - bitmask, indicating device for which @mode needs to be set >> + * @update - update stby bits stored in device's private @data >> + * >> + * For each sensor (accelerometer/magnetometer) there are two operating modes >> + * STANDBY and OPERATION. Neither accel nor magn can be disabled independently >> + * if they are both enabled. Internal sensors state is saved in acc_stby and >> + * mag_stby members of driver's private @data. >> + */ >> +static int kmx61_set_mode(struct kmx61_data *data, u8 mode, u8 device, >> + bool update) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + int acc_stby = -1, mag_stby = -1; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_STBY); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error reading reg_stby\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + if (device & KMX61_ACC) { >> + if (mode & KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT) { >> + ret |= KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; >> + acc_stby = 1; >> + } else { >> + ret &= ~KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; >> + acc_stby = 0; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + if (device & KMX61_MAG) { >> + if (mode & KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT) { >> + ret |= KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + mag_stby = 1; >> + } else { >> + ret &= ~KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + mag_stby = 0; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_STBY, ret); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_stby\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + if (acc_stby != -1 && update) >> + data->acc_stby = !!acc_stby; >> + if (mag_stby != -1 && update) >> + data->mag_stby = !!mag_stby; > Why is there a need for double negation? Correct. Now it doesn't make sense since data->acc_stby is u8. But, with your suggestion if I will use bool to represent data->acc_stby then I think the code should use double negation to make it clear that data->acc_stby is bool and acc_stby is int. >> + >> + return ret; > Since no error occured until this point, just return 0. Ok. Will fix. >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_get_mode(struct kmx61_data *data, u8 *mode, u8 device) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_STBY); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error reading reg_stby\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + *mode = 0; >> + >> + if (device & KMX61_ACC) { >> + if (ret & KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT) >> + *mode |= KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; >> + else >> + *mode &= ~KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; > Simply: > *mode |= ret & KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; Ok. >> + } >> + >> + if (device & KMX61_MAG) { >> + if (ret & KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT) >> + *mode |= KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + else >> + *mode &= ~KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; > Same here: Ok. > *mode |= ret & KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_set_odr(struct kmx61_data *data, int val, int val2, u8 device) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + u8 mode; >> + int lodr_bits, odr_bits; >> + >> + ret = kmx61_get_mode(data, &mode, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + lodr_bits = kmx61_convert_freq_to_bit(val, val2); >> + if (lodr_bits < 0) >> + return lodr_bits; >> + >> + /* To change ODR, accel and magn must be in STDBY */ >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, >> + true); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + odr_bits = 0; >> + if (device & KMX61_ACC) >> + odr_bits |= lodr_bits; >> + if (device & KMX61_MAG) >> + odr_bits |= (lodr_bits << KMX61_MAG_ODR_SHIFT); > No need for parenthesis. ok. >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_ODCNTL, >> + odr_bits); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, mode, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + data->odr_bits = lodr_bits; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static >> +int kmx61_get_odr(struct kmx61_data *data, int *val, int *val2, u8 device) > Usually wrap parameters? And don't put code on line with {. Will fix. >> +{ int i; >> + u8 lodr_bits; >> + >> + if (device & KMX61_ACC) >> + lodr_bits = (data->odr_bits >> KMX61_ACC_ODR_SHIFT) & >> + KMX61_ACC_ODR_MASK; > KMX61_ACC_ODR_SHIFT is just a placebo and not used in kmx61_set_odr. Choose one way and stay consistent. placebo is good. will fix kmx61_set_odr :) >> + else if (device & KMX61_MAG) >> + lodr_bits = (data->odr_bits >> KMX61_MAG_ODR_SHIFT) & >> + KMX61_MAG_ODR_MASK; >> + else >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_samp_freq_table); i++) >> + if (lodr_bits == kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].odr_bits) { >> + *val = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val; >> + *val2 = kmx61_samp_freq_table[i].val2; >> + return 0; > return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO allows you to faciliate _read_raw a bit to just return ret there. Hmm, If you don't mind I want to keep this as it is, just to be consistent with the rest of the functions. The convention used is to return 0 in case of success. >> + } >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_set_range(struct kmx61_data *data, int range) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_CTRL1); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error reading reg_ctrl1\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret &= ~(KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL0_MASK | KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL1_MASK); >> + ret |= kmx61_scale_table[range].gsel0 << KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL0_SHIFT; >> + ret |= kmx61_scale_table[range].gsel1 << KMX61_REG_CTRL1_GSEL1_SHIFT; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_CTRL1, ret); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error writing reg_ctrl1\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + data->range = range; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_set_scale(struct kmx61_data *data, int uscale) >> +{ >> + int ret, i; >> + u8 mode; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_scale_table); i++) { >> + if (kmx61_scale_table[i].uscale == uscale) { >> + ret = kmx61_get_mode(data, &mode, >> + KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, >> + KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = kmx61_set_range(data, i); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return kmx61_set_mode(data, mode, >> + KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + } >> + } >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_chip_init(struct kmx61_data *data) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, KMX61_REG_WHO_AM_I); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "Error reading who_am_i\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + if (ret != KMX61_CHIP_ID) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, >> + "Wrong chip id, got %x expected %x\n", >> + ret, KMX61_CHIP_ID); >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + >> + /* set accel 12bit, 4g range */ >> + ret = kmx61_set_range(data, KMX61_RANGE_4G); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + /* set acc/magn to OPERATION mode */ >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, 0, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); > Just return kmx61_set_mode(data, 0, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); Ok. >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> +/** >> + * kmx61_set_power_state() - set power state for kmx61 @device >> + * @data - kmx61 device private pointer >> + * @on - power state to be set for @device >> + * @device - bitmask indicating device for which @on state needs to be set >> + * >> + * Notice that when ACC power state needs to be set to ON and MAG is in >> + * OPERATION then we know that kmx61_runtime_resume was already called >> + * so we must set ACC OPERATION mode here. The same happens when MAG power >> + * state needs to be set to ON and ACC is in OPERATION. >> + */ >> +static int kmx61_set_power_state(struct kmx61_data *data, bool on, u8 device) >> +{ >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME >> + int ret; >> + >> + if (device & KMX61_ACC) { >> + if (on && !data->acc_ps && !data->mag_stby) >> + kmx61_set_mode(data, 0, KMX61_ACC, true); >> + data->acc_ps = on; >> + } >> + if (device & KMX61_MAG) { >> + if (on && !data->mag_ps && !data->acc_stby) >> + kmx61_set_mode(data, 0, KMX61_MAG, true); >> + data->mag_ps = on; >> + } >> + >> + if (on) { >> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&data->client->dev); >> + } else { >> + pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&data->client->dev); >> + ret = pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&data->client->dev); >> + } >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, >> + "Failed: kmx61_set_power_state for %d, ret %d\n", >> + on, ret); >> + return ret; >> + } >> +#endif >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_read_measurement(struct kmx61_data *data, int base, int offset) > u8 base, u8 offset? Correct. >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + u8 reg = base + offset * 2; >> + >> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_word_data(data->client, reg); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&data->client->dev, "failed to read reg at %x\n", reg); >> + return ret; > This return is unnecessary. Ok. >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, >> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val, >> + int *val2, long mask) > Indentation of the parameters is a bit too high. Ok, will fix. >> +{ >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + int ret; >> + u8 base_reg; >> + >> + switch (mask) { >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW: >> + switch (chan->type) { >> + case IIO_ACCEL: >> + case IIO_MAGN: >> + base_reg = KMX61_ACC_XOUT_L; >> + break; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + >> + kmx61_set_power_state(data, true, chan->address); >> + ret = kmx61_read_measurement(data, base_reg, chan->scan_index); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, chan->address); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + *val = sign_extend32(ret >> chan->scan_type.shift, >> + chan->scan_type.realbits - 1); >> + kmx61_set_power_state(data, false, chan->address); >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + return IIO_VAL_INT; >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE: >> + switch (chan->type) { >> + case IIO_ACCEL: >> + *val = 0; >> + *val2 = kmx61_scale_table[data->range].uscale; >> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO; >> + case IIO_MAGN: >> + /* 14 bits res, 1465 microGauss per magn count */ >> + *val = 0; >> + *val2 = 1465; >> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: >> + if (chan->type != IIO_ACCEL && chan->type != IIO_MAGN) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_get_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); > Could be just return ret here, if kmx61_get_odr() returns IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO on success and -EINVAL on error. As explained above, I prefer not to do this. More than that, I can't do ret here because the data->lock is held. >> + if (ret) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO; >> + } >> + return -EINVAL; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_write_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, >> + struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int val, >> + int val2, long mask) > Indentation of parameters is too high. Ok. >> +{ >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + int ret; >> + >> + switch (mask) { >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ: >> + if (chan->type != IIO_ACCEL && chan->type != IIO_MAGN) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_set_odr(data, val, val2, chan->address); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + return ret; >> + case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE: >> + switch (chan->type) { >> + case IIO_ACCEL: >> + if (val != 0) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_set_scale(data, val2); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + return ret; >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + return ret; > This won't be reached (if so, ret would not be initialized). >> + default: >> + return -EINVAL; >> + } >> + return ret; > Same here. I know. Would initializing ret with 0 will be enough? >> +} >> + >> +static const struct iio_info kmx61_info = { >> + .driver_module = THIS_MODULE, >> + .read_raw = kmx61_read_raw, >> + .write_raw = kmx61_write_raw, >> + .attrs = &kmx61_attribute_group, >> +}; >> + >> +static int kmx61_probe(struct i2c_client *client, >> + const struct i2c_device_id *id) >> +{ >> + struct kmx61_data *data; >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev; >> + int ret; >> + const char *name = NULL; >> + >> + indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data)); >> + if (!indio_dev) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev); >> + data->client = client; >> + >> + if (id) >> + name = id->name; >> + >> + indio_dev->dev.parent = &client->dev; >> + indio_dev->channels = kmx61_channels; >> + indio_dev->num_channels = ARRAY_SIZE(kmx61_channels); >> + indio_dev->name = name; >> + indio_dev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE; >> + indio_dev->info = &kmx61_info; >> + >> + mutex_init(&data->lock); >> + >> + ret = kmx61_chip_init(data); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + return ret; >> + >> + ret = iio_device_register(indio_dev); >> + if (ret < 0) { >> + dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to register iio device\n"); >> + goto err_iio_device_register; >> + } >> + >> + ret = pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev); >> + if (ret < 0) >> + goto err_pm_runtime_set_active; >> + >> + pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev); >> + pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&client->dev, KMX61_SLEEP_DELAY_MS); >> + pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&client->dev); >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +err_pm_runtime_set_active: >> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); >> +err_iio_device_register: >> + kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_remove(struct i2c_client *client) >> +{ >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(client); >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + int ret; >> + >> + pm_runtime_disable(&client->dev); >> + pm_runtime_set_suspended(&client->dev); >> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&client->dev); >> + >> + iio_device_unregister(indio_dev); >> + >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP >> +static int kmx61_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)); >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + int ret; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, >> + false); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)); >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + u8 stby = 0; >> + >> + if (data->acc_stby) >> + stby |= KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; >> + if (data->mag_stby) >> + stby |= KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + >> + return kmx61_set_mode(data, stby, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME >> +static int kmx61_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)); >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + int ret; >> + >> + mutex_lock(&data->lock); >> + ret = kmx61_set_mode(data, KMX61_ALL_STBY, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> + mutex_unlock(&data->lock); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int kmx61_runtime_resume(struct device *dev) >> +{ >> + struct iio_dev *indio_dev = i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)); >> + struct kmx61_data *data = iio_priv(indio_dev); >> + u8 stby = 0; >> + >> + if (!data->acc_ps) >> + stby |= KMX61_ACC_STBY_BIT; >> + if (!data->mag_ps) >> + stby |= KMX61_MAG_STBY_BIT; >> + >> + return kmx61_set_mode(data, stby, KMX61_ACC | KMX61_MAG, true); >> +} >> +#endif >> + >> +static const struct dev_pm_ops kmx61_pm_ops = { >> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(kmx61_suspend, kmx61_resume) >> + SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(kmx61_runtime_suspend, kmx61_runtime_resume, NULL) >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct i2c_device_id kmx61_id[] = { >> + {"kmx611021", 0}, >> + {} >> +}; >> + >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, kmx61_id); >> + >> +static struct i2c_driver kmx61_driver = { >> + .driver = { >> + .name = KMX61_DRV_NAME, >> + .pm = &kmx61_pm_ops, >> + }, >> + .probe = kmx61_probe, >> + .remove = kmx61_remove, >> + .id_table = kmx61_id, >> +}; >> + >> +module_i2c_driver(kmx61_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Daniel Baluta "); >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("KMX61 accelerometer/magnetometer driver"); >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); Hartmut, thanks a lot for your reviews. I will send a patch series with these cleanups together with changes for ACPI, buffer and trigger support. Daniel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/