Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:01:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:01:07 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-139.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.139]:9108 "HELO spf1.us.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:01:06 -0500 Message-ID: <20021222170906.13011.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" , akpm@digeo.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 01:09:06 +0800 Subject: Re: Poor performance with 2.5.52, load and process in D state X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 859 Lines: 27 From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" [...] Just to add the result of one more test: > Ok, I'm back with the results of the osdb test against 2.4.19 and 2.5.52 > Both the kernel booted with apm=off mem=40M > osdb ran with 40M of data. > To summarize the results: > 2.4.19 "Single User Test" 806.78 seconds (0:13:26.78) > 2.5.52 "Single User Test" 3771.85 seconds (1:02:51.85) 2.4.19(mem=24M) "Single User Test" 3371.98 seconds (0:56:11.98) Ciao, Paolo -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with POP3/IMAP access for only US$19.95/yr Powered by Outblaze - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/