Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751194AbaKYQU0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:20:26 -0500 Received: from gloria.sntech.de ([95.129.55.99]:36864 "EHLO gloria.sntech.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751117AbaKYQUX (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 11:20:23 -0500 From: Heiko =?ISO-8859-1?Q?St=FCbner?= To: Kever Yang Cc: Chris Zhong , dianders@chromium.org, Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Linus Walleij , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Rob Herring , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Increase the maximum cpu frequency of rk3288 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 17:23:59 +0100 Message-ID: <3297542.UgVU3NH89O@diego> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16-3-amd64; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <5474AAB4.2060301@rock-chips.com> References: <1416908253-31721-1-git-send-email-zyw@rock-chips.com> <5474AAB4.2060301@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chris, Kever, Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 00:13:40 schrieb Kever Yang: > On 11/25/2014 05:37 PM, Chris Zhong wrote: > > The maximum cpu frequency of rk3288 can up to 1.8Ghz, but the vdd_cpu need > > set to 1.4v. I've tested these patches on rk3288 evb board. > > I'm not sure why you need this patch, I think we have a discuss > for the cpu operating point before. > In this case: > 1. rk3288.dtsi is for all the rk3288 Soc based system, you may need > a separate opp table in rk3288-evb-rk808.dts; > 2. 1.4V may beyond the supported voltage range too much, > and it's not a good idea to add it to rk3288.dtsi as a safe voltage. > 3. Do you have a stress/heavy load test on evb with 1.4v at 1.8GHz? That is how I remember it as well ... the default opp table is supposed to contain only the safest of values, while individual boards can then increase those in conjunction with their thermal design. As the evb itself does only have the naked soc without any heat-sink or similar, I'm not even sure if these additional frequencies should be enabled there at all. Heiko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/