Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:48:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:48:20 -0500 Received: from cpe-24-221-190-179.ca.sprintbbd.net ([24.221.190.179]:19683 "EHLO myware.akkadia.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:48:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3E062712.80906@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:56:50 -0800 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20021221 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "James H. Cloos Jr." CC: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Intel P6 vs P7 system call performance References: <3E0617A9.90405@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 916 Lines: 21 James H. Cloos Jr. wrote: > I'd tend to prefer an LD_PRELOAD-able dso that just set up %gs and had > entries for each of the foo(2) over a full glibc rpm. This is not possible. The infrastructure is set up in the dynamic linker. Read the mail with the references to the NPTL mailing list. The second referenced mail contains a recipe for building glibc and then using it in-place. This is not possible with binary RPMs in the way we build them. -- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `--------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/