Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:58:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:58:35 -0500 Received: from smtp.comcast.net ([24.153.64.2]:19612 "EHLO smtp.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 15:58:31 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:11:37 -0500 From: Joshua Stewart Subject: From __cpu_raise_softirq() to net_rx_action() To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <1040591503.11608.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-10) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 21 I'm still trying to follow a packet (or even better an sk_buff) from the NIC card to user space. I think I have a good chunk of it figured out, but I'm missing a bit from the time that the __netif_rx_schedule() routine calls __cpu_raise_softirq() until the routine net_rx_action() occurs. I read in a book on Linux TCP/IP implementation that the softirq basically leads to a call to net_rx_action(), but I don't see the connection yet. It's probably due to my lack of understanding of IRQ's (and software IRQ's). Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/