Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:08:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:08:41 -0500 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:45528 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 16:08:41 -0500 Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 13:15:23 -0800 (PST) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: To: Joshua Stewart cc: Subject: Re: From __cpu_raise_softirq() to net_rx_action() In-Reply-To: <1040591503.11608.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1063 Lines: 25 On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Joshua Stewart wrote: | I'm still trying to follow a packet (or even better an sk_buff) from the | NIC card to user space. I think I have a good chunk of it figured out, | but I'm missing a bit from the time that the __netif_rx_schedule() | routine calls __cpu_raise_softirq() until the routine net_rx_action() | occurs. I read in a book on Linux TCP/IP implementation that the | softirq basically leads to a call to net_rx_action(), but I don't see | the connection yet. It's probably due to my lack of understanding of | IRQ's (and software IRQ's). | | Any help is appreciated. What are you going to do with this good info when you have it? Something like putting it on a web page would be very good, so that other people with similar questions can have a reference to look at. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/