Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751396AbaKYVi7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:38:59 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:50391 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751289AbaKYVi6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 16:38:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 13:38:57 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jungseung Lee Cc: Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fs/binfmt_elf.c: fix inconsistent vma dump size Message-Id: <20141125133857.bb2d71659287df6aa908de5b@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1416683799-678-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@gmail.com> References: <1416683799-678-1-git-send-email-js07.lee@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 23 Nov 2014 04:16:39 +0900 Jungseung Lee wrote: > vma_dump_size() has been used several times on actual dumper > and it is supposed to be same values for same vma. > But vma_dump_size() could be different, while coredump is procceeded. > (e.g. remove shared memory) > > In that case, header info and vma size could be inconsistent > and it cause wrong coredump file creation. > > Fix the problem by always using the same vma dump size > which is stored in vma_filsz. So concurrent shared memory removal causes inconsistencies. But concurrent shared memory removal can still cause inconsistency after this patch, can't it? If it happens while vma_filesz[] is being populated or if it happens between vma_filesz[] population and vma_filesz[] usage. This will result in a dump file which is internally consistent, but is inconsistent with reality? If my understanding is correct then please fully describe this scenario within the changelog and explain why it is tolerable, if it is tolerable. > @@ -2093,7 +2083,20 @@ static int elf_core_dump(struct coredump_params *cprm) > > dataoff = offset = roundup(offset, ELF_EXEC_PAGESIZE); > > - offset += elf_core_vma_data_size(gate_vma, cprm->mm_flags); > + vma_filesz = kmalloc(sizeof(*vma_filesz) * (segs - 1), GFP_KERNEL); Use kmalloc_array() here, in case a disaster has occurred... > + if (!vma_filesz) > + goto end_coredump; > + > + for (i = 0, vma = first_vma(current, gate_vma); vma != NULL; > + vma = next_vma(vma, gate_vma)) { > + unsigned long dump_size; > + > + dump_size = vma_dump_size(vma, cprm->mm_flags); > + vma_filesz[i++] = dump_size; > + vma_data_size += dump_size; > + } > + > + offset += vma_data_size; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/