Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:39:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:39:00 -0500 Received: from c17928.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.249.29]:4480 "EHLO laptop.localdomain") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Sun, 22 Dec 2002 20:39:00 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Con Kolivas To: Robert Love Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] scheduler tunables with contest - starvation_limit Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 12:48:34 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200212201048.52690.conman@kolivas.net> <1040605610.2127.3.camel@icbm> In-Reply-To: <1040605610.2127.3.camel@icbm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200212231248.41958.conman@kolivas.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1054 Lines: 30 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 18:48, Con Kolivas wrote: >> osdl, contest, tunable - starvation limit on 2.5.52-mm1 > >Con, curiously, what is this OSDL hardware like? > >One thing I always liked about your Contest runs were you did them on >your home machine, which was presumably fairly run-of-the-mill so we >could keep an eye on the low-end desktop machines. Forgot to mention I've been doing the scheduler tunables in smp mode just so it wouldnt take me too long to get results. I have no doubt the signal to noise ratio is greater in the uniprocessor results though. Con -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+BmtyF6dfvkL3i1gRAq6wAJ9M1DlPK8JL5RaEbaOOcA6z+KhmZwCcDn+W MUDPF6uqNGyQ8FRtWyr07B4= =6oDv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/